Discussion about this post

User's avatar
blank's avatar

There's something sinister that comes through in the end of this piece. The focus on peace between the races makes it clear that the priority is preventing the kshatriyas from enacting any sort of violence. Violence committed by the dalits or the brahmins against the kshatriyas is merely an unfortunate occurrence that 'should be' suppressed, but isn't as important as the reverse. If this is the fundamental attitude that animates leftism / deep leftism, can't vibe with it.

Expand full comment
Salty Drank's avatar

Your analysis is great until you start to delve into history and historical patterns. You take too many liberties in making sweeping and baseless interpretations that you attempt to pass off as historical fact and laws of nature. For example, Christianity began as a Zealot and Ebonite adjacent movement, not as a movement by Hellenized Jews. Jesus was not a Hellenized Jew from the upper class but a Galillean peasant. Paul was knowledgeable in Greek customs but he came from the Phariseeic tradition which emphasized traditional purity. Overall, there is no evidence that early Jewish Christians were Hellenized Jews. Furthermore, when the torch of Christianity passed from Judea to Greece, it passed to the Greek Gentiles, not to Hellenized Jews in Greece, because Paul preached to the Gentiles, NOT to Hellenized Jews. Another example is your claim that the Indo Europeans utilized slave revolts in neolithic Europe. There is absolutely zero evidence of such revolts anywhere in neolithic Europe, even from Greece and the Italian Peninsula where we have the most archeological remains from neolithic European civilization, much less of the tactical use of such revolts by Indo European invaders.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts