Death to femcels.
Get thee behind me.
Femcelism is a digital ideology of victimhood and martyrdom, like nonbinary or queer. If you call yourself a femcel, I don’t care if you Heil Hitler or read Nietzsche — you are a degenerate.
Right-wingers believe that “degeneracy” is a violation of purity. Porn; prostitution; the Jewish art of Weimar Germany; anything primitive or sensual; and even nudity itself is degenerate. But this definition is a right-wing lie, an etymological inversion.
True degeneracy refers to the loss of generative powers: old age, sclerosis, fear, and impotence. The degenerate is one who is unable to generate; he has no balls; she has no eggs. Degeneracy is anything which stifles, suppresses, or negates sexual power.
Femcelism is supremely degenerate: a series of toxic, self-harming, self-fulfilling prophecies which sever women from their capacity for physical intimacy. Any man who tries to “fix” such a girl is like a lifeguard dragged down by a flailing swimmer. They will both drown.1
The femcel is a self-negating cancer. A disease. Three red flags — 3,000 red flags. They are Machiavellian, manipulative, self-obsessed, controlling, power-hungry victim-martyrs, worse than the man-hating feminist with blue hair.2
This sounds harsh, but it has two purposes. If you give sympathy to femcels, you will not save them. By rewarding them, you will only worsen their addiction to the martyr-victim complex.3 Secondly, if you are protective of femcels, you will encourage men to think, “I can save her.” This results in harm to young men, who are tricked into worshipping the femcel as a Goddess.4
what is femcelism?
Femcels, like incels, do not exist. If a woman tells you she cannot have sex, she is lying. This is a very simple truth, but one which femcels (and their right-wing white-knight defenders) will go in infinite circles to avoid.
What about ugly bitches? Fat bitches? Burn victims? What about autistic shut-ins who never leave the house? What about girls with no ass, and no tits? What about girls with big ears and hooked noses? What about…
I don’t care if you’re in a wheelchair, or terminally online, or 300 pounds, or have the body of a 12 year old boy. There is a man who will fetishize you, not in spite of your missing limbs, but because of them. There is a man who will fuck you, not because you are beautiful, but because he likes the fact that you are ugly. For some weird reason, it turns him on.
The problem isn’t that he doesn’t want to fuck you; it’s that you don’t want to fuck him. You want to control him. It is this refusal to submit that characterizes the femcel. She is unwilling to make herself available to a man because she hates herself, and fears abandonment.
The femcel is horny,5 but her desire for power, control, and perfection overrides her natural ability for intimacy. The femcel would rather be a perfect victim than to risk love.
The femcel hates the world and everyone in it for not giving her enough attention; for ignoring her, neglecting her, and bullying her. She is Elliot Rodger in female form. Instead of going on a murder spree, her revenge is masochistic, turned inwardly.
When teen girls cut themselves, their pleasure is not just the adrenaline of the physical blade, but martyrdom. It is the same pleasure of the medieval flagellants, whipping themselves in the streets, or the man who enjoys watching his wife fuck other men from the cuck chair.
The femcel imagines herself as the victim of society or biology, embracing passive helplessness. No one wants her; she’s too ugly; too autistic; too worthless. These lies are the mental, psychological, spiritual equivalent of cutting one’s wrists.
The femcel worships the anti-hero. She inverts the social hierarchy and places herself at the bottom of an upside-down pyramid. Her ego is fed by the specialness of being “uniquely cursed.” This becomes a toxic cycle, a self-fulfilling prophecy. The more that she identifies as an alienated, tormented, and excluded witch, the more she becomes resentful, driving a further wedge between herself and intimacy.
PHALLUS
If you go to church every week, pray the rosary, and believe in God with all your heart, you are not a femcel. You are making an active, consensual,6 faith-based decision to withhold yourself from sexual activity. You are not taking on the victim-identity of being “forever alone.”7
I have idiosyncratic beliefs on God, but to put it simply:
God is the representation, Platonic form, and supreme personality of the hero. He is the source of boldness, bravery, courage, loyalty, truth-telling, discipline, honor, duty, mercy, forgiveness, and the eternal, perfect, infinite life. He is not distant from us in the far-flung future or ancient past, but immanent, now, in the present moment. We look toward God with awe and reverence; with God, anything is possible. We accept his supremacy, listen intently for his voice, willing to endure all hardship for the sake of his power and glory.8
But isolated from any religious intention, virginity is not praiseworthy. Secular virginity is a perversion and a caricature, one that replaces God with victimary narcissism.
On the surface, femcels are implicitly “trad,” in worshipping their own virginity (even while lamenting or complaining about it). But this superficial consequentialism ignores the intention of that ancient cult: it was designed to intensify the sexual possession, ownership, and conquest of women by men.
The ancient cult of virginity was erected as phallus-worship. By contrast, femcelism, a cult of misanthropy and self-hatred, does the exact opposite. They don’t worship a phallic God; they worship their own victimhood.9 They subvert their natural sex drive with hostility, self-torture, and self-hatred.10
temple prostitutes.
I love women who use their sexual energy for good. A sexy woman is invigorating — she brings forth a man’s inner potential. The sexy stewardess on the plane inspires me to awaken from my lethargy and redouble and sharpen my writing. The sexy cheerleader inspires the football player to be more violent and vicious, to never give up hope in victory. Even sexually attractive family members, unconsciously, can inspire a man toward greater heights.
Through seduction, the sexy woman draws out of a man his dormant heroic powers. She inspires him to action. When Virgil prays to the Muses, he establishes their supernatural psychic beauty as a compelling attractive force, which motivates him to write. Women are not useful because they are pure, but because they inspire intensity, and drive men mad. Their Dionysian frenzies make us go crazy. This is their praiseworthy, generative power.11
In the Mahabharata, Ulupi, the snake princess, seduces Prince Arjuna; Prince Bhima is seduced by the demon princess Hidimbi. These animalistic, feral females were overcome with lustful sexual desire, and demanded big Aryan cock. Naturally, the sons of God sired great warriors with big-breasted monster-sluts.12
By contrast, in the Ramayana, Manthara, the hunchback spinster servant to the queen, hears that Rama is to become king. Jealous, narcissistic, and subversive, Manthara instructs the queen as follows:
First, make yourself appear as a victim. Dirty your appearance. Act distressed. Garner attention by forcing yourself to cry. Then, in this state of dishevelment and self-pity, you can morally manipulate the king into getting what you want. Exile Rama to the forest, so your own son can become king.
The story of Manthara is an attempt to humiliate God, and to turn the people against him. The femcel, a tamasic materialist, is filled with the Mantharic spirit — a resentful hunchback who tries to exile the heroic. She is a manipulator who refuses to submit to the superior man.
CAUSAL FALLACIES
The slut tells it to you straight: she wants sex. Of course, the desire for sex can become perverted, just as the desire for food can become perverse. In perversion, consumption is not driven by positive desire (eros), but as a means to distract from some deeper spiritual pain (thanatos).13 “Porn addiction,” like “food addiction,” is not real — it covers up some deeper problem.
A healthy man might enjoy porn, but he can go enjoy other things as well, like sports and friendship and literature. He doesn’t hate himself during his goon session, and he feels no guilt afterwards. But a truly broken man uses porn not as a pleasurable form of hedonism, but as a guilt-ridden compulsive “filling of the void.” The problem is not the porn, but the void.
The guilt that “porn addicts” experience is not a bug, but a feature. They want something to feel guilty about; that’s why they specifically seek out porn that makes them feel bad, evil, humiliated, and ashamed. They do this because in concentrating their guilt upon porn, it externalizes and projects their pre-existing feelings of guilt and shame into an object. Guilty men use porn as a form of scapegoating, not hedonism. They are blaming porn for their brokenness, rather than taking responsibility and confronting their deeper problems. It is learned helplessness; the victim-martyr complex.
Similarly, girls use sex to distract themselves or “fill the void,” are not damaged because of sluttiness; the sluttiness is downstream of the damage.14 Just as sluttiness is not a cause of damage, virginity is not a cause of virtue.
Right-wingers who worship femcels say: “Look at the statistics. Virgins won’t divorce you, or steal your kids.” But the correlation between virginity and marital longevity is due to a third “cofounder” — religion.15 Religion makes marriages last longer and religion also causes women to be virgins.16 But these two consequences of religion do not mean that virgins are necessarily better than sluts.17
The right-wing belief that virginity magically protects women from becoming evil leads men to worship femcels, resulting in ruin and heartache. To worship a woman is to invert her healthy desires, which is for the confident, initiatory, and adventurous man. To prize female “loyalty” so highly, sacrificing all other qualities,18 is safetyism.
The man who values virginity above all fears that his woman will leave him. His safetyist insecurity reflects a lack of belief in himself, and his inability to survive abandonment. His worship of the virgin is a codependent reliance on the woman as a mother. In worshipping the virgin, he infantilizes himself and removes his own agency. He prefers, like a child clinging to an abusive parent, to be trapped in an unhappy and miserable relationship, rather than to briefly experience romance with a monster-slut. He fears the pain of loss — he fears death, not understanding the eternal nature of the soul. In the worship of the femcel, man and woman are joined in misery.
SUMMARY
If you are withholding sex from men because you love God and you want to serve him with all your heart, I have no problem with that. But femcels are not devout. They worship selfish martyrdom, making themselves out to be the biggest victims of a cruel, godless, unforgiving world.
Femcels want moralistic power. In the same way that goyim delight in abusing themselves, calling themselves autistic, retarded, schizophrenic, disabled, and discriminated against, “femcels” claim to be uniquely lonely, aggrieved, and cursed.
Femcels are miserable not because they are unlovable; but they are unlovable because they refuse to compromise, submit to, or make themselves available to men. For every ugly woman, there is an ugly man. Femcels don’t accept this; they would rather be alone than tolerate imperfection.
If you believe sex is evil because the Bible said so, that’s dogmatic and pig-headed, but I appreciate that you are trying to be a good person. If you are an atheist, and you think sex will turn you into a “worthless slut,” then this reveals your superficiality and fearful materialism.19
A woman who desires sex, but withholds it, is not morally superior to a “slut” who fucks Chad. The slut is prettier, more sociable, and probably a nicer person. The slut has a more beautiful soul than the femcel.
Femcels are nasty. They love misery, darkness, and victimhood. They imagine themselves at the bottom of a totem pole, and get a narcissistic pleasure out of believing that they, alone, suffer.20 Like looksmaxers, they lack empathy.
If you, as a woman, deeply wish for male companionship, stop being a victim. Abandon the darkness, and embrace the light. Stop worshipping your own martyrdom. Serve others. Dedicate yourself to a higher purpose than self-pity. Worship the heroic phallus, and reject the horror-comedy of femcelism.
CONCLUSION
Femcels are dark, manipulative, self-obsessed witches, oozing self-hatred behind them, like the trail of a slug.21 I write to defend and protect young men against the trap of fetishizing virgins. This fetishization can only lead to misery and self-destruction.22
Religious women who are voluntarily celibate are not the object of my ire. It is those mentally-ill witches who maintain their virginity out of a martyr complex who I wish to utterly destroy.
Young men, influenced by the right-wing, have come to fetishize virginity as representing purity and goodness. But in the age of social media, this is further and further from the truth. A normal, healthy woman will have sex soon after completing puberty, unless she has some compelling religious reason stopping her. An atheist who refuses to have sex after completing puberty is repressing herself, to feed her ego, filled with misanthropic moralism.
Narcissists come in all shapes and sizes. We imagine narcissists to all be like Trump: loud, brash, and in-your-face. But many narcissists are inverts; they make themselves small, quiet, and meek. This is a facade. The goal of inverted narcissists is the same: to inflate their own egos. They do this through self-pity, misery, and depression.
If you obsess over your worst traits, and roll around in the pigsty of negative thoughts, you will live in hell. Not only do you hurt yourself, you also deny others the power of your love, which is the greatest sin of all.23
A strong sex drive is a necessary precondition for heroism,24 because it is the source of all generative power. In men, sexuality is the basis for aggression, risk-taking, bravery, boldness, and courage, and by extension, the basis of science, innovation, and philosophy. In women, sexuality represents a complementary force, which draws these traits out of men.
Like every other woke victim group, femcels want you to believe that they deserve your empathy. They do not. Femcels have no purpose; they serve only themselves, and worship their own misery.25 Whereas the classical narcissist worships his beauty, the inverted narcissist worships her own misery.
I repeat myself for emphasis: One might take pity on such a creature, but beware: those who hate themselves are like drowning swimmers. Try to save them, and they will drag you down with them. You cannot help someone who will not participate in their own rescue.
I’ve also dated girls with OnlyFans accounts, and exhibitionists, who shared their nudes for free, simply for the love of the game. Their performative sluttery has a deeper purpose. Those girls, even if confused or obscured, whether or not they are going about this quest in a logical or constructive way, flawed and attention-seeking as they might be, were not reprobate irredeemable scum. Perhaps they did perform some regrettable or undignified acts, but that is forgivable. I recognize their intention, which is love. They have souls, and desire intimacy and human connection.
This is not helping them; it is actually hurting them. I practice tough love. Femcels are invited to cure themselves by becoming paid subscribers and following my commands.
When we are taken away from the worship of God, we end up in hell.
According to her, she’s desperate to be fucked.
A femcel claims to be involuntarily celibate, like an incel. Those who choose to be celibate for God do so voluntarily.
Whatever problems I have with right-wing Christians, at the very least, they understand that celibacy is a choice. [Hyper-religious women come with their own set of problems. I’m not a fan of Trump-worshipping, snake-handling, Bible-thumping right-wingers. Hyper-religious women are not for me. Have fun, and good luck, Christian men.] Celibacy is not something forced on you by the cruelty of fate; it is something you dedicate to God, because you worship him as your heavenly Father. I can appreciate a vow of celibacy, so long as that decision is done toward a higher purpose: hope, obedience, love, and duty.
The ancient value of virginity was generally accepted among all Semitic and Aryan peoples.
Historically, Hinduism, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all valued female virginity. The Bhagavad Gita begins its first chapter with Arjuna lamenting how, when religion is destroyed, the first consequence is that women have sex outside of proper marriages, leading to the birth of “unwanted populations” (bastards). From Ireland to Egypt to India, the cult of virginity was a consistent feature of patriarchal cultures.
Lesbians, unlike bisexuals, have no desire for the phallus. On the surface, they are the most extreme opponents of patriarchal culture, but also, they reject femininity as a principle, making themselves out to be substitutes for men. By refusing to submit to men, lesbians actually are attempting to replace men, and to become men. Hence, they are patriarchal, albeit in a self-tortured and impotent way. Bisexual women do not have this problem.
If lesbianism is biological, rather than psychological, then it is excusable. But femcels are clearly choosing not to have sex.
Femcels are not virgins out of respect for their father, or respect for God. Instead, they are use their virginity to win points in the victimhood Olympics.
Everything said here about women can also apply to the beautiful male form.
Iravan and Ghatotkacha died heroically in the Battle of Kurukshetra.
Was the desire of their mothers evil or something to be condemned? Not at all — the Kshatriya, the Chad class, is duty-bound to fuck kinky demon sluts, to breed more warriors.
This is not to say that this was the main goal or the only quest of God-heroes. Their lives were mostly spent working out, training, killing demons, meditating in nature, traveling, debating philosophical topics, wrestling, and going on road trips. I am not suggesting that one should make fucking sluts the goal of life. I am saying, however, that if a slut desires to have sex with you, there is no sin in acceding to her demands — in fact, to reject her could be a sin.
The problem is not excessive positive desire or lust, but the deeper negative underlying brokenness.
This is not to say that sex cannot be damaging. Sex is dangerous, and traumatic. [I would also say that love is dangerous and traumatic. If you fall deeply in love with someone, and then lose them, this is like death. This doesn’t mean, however, that loving someone is evil, or that sex is evil.] Children who are sexually abused, for example, often become hyper-sexual as a way of coping with that abuse. But my point is that the symptom is not the cause; sluttiness is not a problem in itself, but a manifestation of a deeper pain.
I define religion in a very loose way. There are, perhaps, some atheistic women who are “religious” in the sense of adhering to a very strict set of moral codes and principles. For example, a feminist might believe that it is wrong to have sex outside a committed relationship as a way to “fight the patriarchy.” This is a better motivation than femcelism.
I would also argue that virgins, being more controlling and type-A, have a tendency to be more controlling and possessive, which might reduce the risk of divorce. But spinning this outcome as a positive, rather than a form of abusive longhousing, is deceptive.
This is especially the case now that everyone is watching porn and having less sex.
Divorce statistics have a significant chronological lag. When you’re looking at the lifetime rate of divorce, you are looking at people who are over age 30. This is because the average age of marriage is close to 28, and the average length of marriage is something like 8 years, so the average age of a divorced person is 36. Hence, these are people who were born in 1990. They grew up with the norms of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. That was a different time. Culturally, it was a different country.
There were no “femcels” in 1990.
I considered that perhaps people who get divorced tend to marry earlier. But I looked up the statistics and the average age at first divorce for women is 40.
(such as sensuality, kindness, gentleness, submissiveness, service, reciprocity, love)
As Jesus said, sin is not what goes into you, but what comes out of you. He was not talking about vaginal discharge. He was referring to lust and desire. Morally, we are defined by our intentions and desires, not the consequences of our actions. We cannot control our ultimate destiny. Babies die of disease; school children are bombed; tornadoes tear up houses in the dark of night. We can try to live good lives, but good people are ruined by cruel misfortune, and bad people continue to profit. If we define humans by their fruits, then we would have to call the baby bad for dying, and the criminal good for profiting. There must be a higher moral standard than mere consequentialism.
We are called by God to love one another. Since we are animals, and animals have sex, this involves having sex with one another. Ideally, sex works with (rather than against) other forms of love, such as friendship, duty, honor, and loyalty. I’m not endorsing Worst Boyfriend Ever as the Platonic ideal of a loving man. Nor am I suggesting that any man should make it the goal of his life to fuck as many sluts as possible.
Ideally, men (and women) should have sex in accordance to physical desire, and not according to some fake egoic status game, where they are trying to escape fear, or establish themselves as “man enough.” Wasting your time chasing a higher body count for “bragging rights” is pathetic. Sexual “Goodharting” is a bugman mindset, and evidence of deep insecurity.
No femcel will read this and feel anything other than a confirmation of her own victimhood. Femcels and their white-knights will call me a bully, and use my words to inflate their narcissistic persecution-complex.
[Young men contain the highest concentration of life force, the capacity for revolution and change. I say this as a leftist. You can say, “well, that’s not very leftist of you,” and I say your definition of leftism is very superficial.
When Plato built his school, he directly challenged the traditionalists of Athens. The philosophy was revolutionary, and directly influenced the rise of Christianity centuries later. It was a universal philosophy, and deconstructed not just the tradition of the Athenians, but all traditions in general. If fighting tradition is not leftism, I don’t know what is.
Now Plato never banned women from learning philosophy; he wasn’t exclusionary. I don’t exclude women either.]
In Christianity, the worst term is “Satanic” or “demonic,” and they apply these terms to Epstein’s Island or even threesomes. But sex is a natural expression of a healthy, animalistic instinct. As previously mentioned, sex can serve the purpose of “filling the void,” but the sin then is not the sex itself, but the unwillingness to confront that deeper brokenness.
As the Mahabharata instructs us, King Pandu the Pale was born as a result of the sage Vyasa breaking his vow of celibacy — celibacy, in this case, is explicitly described as a way in which Vyasa increases his sexual potency. The purpose of celibacy is not to eliminate the sexual organs, but to strengthen them for a higher purpose.
They aren’t saving their virginity out of loyalty to God, but because they revel in a victimhood complex.










Frankly the entire weeb chan culture has a lot of precious misanthropic angels who seem to be raised on abstinence only education tying virginity to virtue.
The boycels and girlcels all think that sex means cooties and degeneracy, the way the boycels fuck themselves is feeling aversion to the very loose women who are most likely to screw them. The girlcels screw everyone by NOT screwing these guys… since that would make them a slut or something.
So many of these people I want to say are volcels, they believe in abstinence only education so rig everything to reject getting laid while bitching about it.
In every other subculture, the boys and girls within it fuck each other, such as metalheads, goths punks and juggalos. Country fans, they’re fucking each other.
It’s only in this fucked up 4chan culture where the boys and girls can’t fuck each other because of their precious anime character purity and Christ complex.
Serial Experiments Lain is my girl 😫. Fun to see her here.
In my experience this psychological archetype is not especially correlated with low sexuality. But maybe that's changed.