Death to White Nationalism.

breeding the rajasic man.

In 2010, no one else in my high school had ever heard of “race realism,” “the Jewish Question,” “white genocide” or “the great replacement.”¹ On the outside, I was a failing student. But on the inside, I was ahead of the curve, in the eye of the storm, riding the unstoppable wave of history.²

After 2017, white nationalism was defeated by success. The masculine, revolutionary spirit became deflated and flaccid. It was co-opted, watered down, and made impotent through dilution. After being stripped of positive, progressive idealism, all that was left was resentful third-worldism, medieval superstition, and cheering for the collapse of “the gay American ZOG empire.” The redpill was turned upside down. Harmeet Dhillon, JD Vance, Kash Patel, RFK, Dan Bongino, and other grifting clowns now own the future of “MAGA.” The alt-right became a zombified puppet in the hand of the GOP.³

I needed to discover a deeper strategy that could withstand the endless waves of “goyslop,” built on unshakeable and eternal ideals. What was “Faustian civilization”? What made it distinct?

THE GUNAS

In 2017, I investigated the Vedic and Platonic elements of the soul, or gunas: sattvic, rajasic, and tamasic:

1. The Sattvic is defined by logos; abstract, metaphysical ideas.⁴

2. The Rajasic corresponds with Platonic thumos; the broad-shouldered Spartan of flesh and blood, the conquering warrior, Nietzsche’s blond beast.⁵

3. The Tamasic is driven not by love or lust, but by egoic fear, worshipping money and status.

The tamasic is not eros (hedonistic or sensual pleasure),⁶ but THANATOS, the fear of death. Death takes many forms: social death, romantic death, financial death, the fear of being “cucked,” exclusion, loneliness, and rejection. The Tamasic chases social survival like a worm on its belly, climbing through arbitrary, absurd, and superficial hierarchies. Being a professionally-polite brown-noser and shallow sociopathic-sycophant generates continual self-hatred. To achieve catharsis, the Tamasic indulges in horror-comedy, denigrating transcendent virtues (like honor, duty, loyalty, and self-sacrifice).

Irony and sarcasm provide comic relief from memories of teenage bullying and humiliation. Brutal pessimism and fanatical cynicism leads to Schadenfreude, scapegoating caricatures of the misshapen and the unfortunate.⁷ The Tamasic combines clownish irreverence with the sadism of a serial killer. There is no better symbol for this horror-comedy than the Joker.

This is Rudolf Steiner’s Ahriman — intelligence without virtue. The Tamasic seeks the philosopher’s stone — the defeat of death by limitless wealth and endless life. The Tamasic is Scrooge, a lich, witch, or vampire, a manipulative parasite who feeds off the lifeforce of others, creating nothing.⁸

The tamasic is represented by the cacophony of the Mediterranean bazaar or Ladyboy brothel. In dense cities between Babylon and Bangkok, social competition was fierce, and tribal nepotism reached its zenith, producing a diverse cauldron of vicious scamming and tribal hatred.

In contrast, the Rajasic type is represented by Faustian civilization, beginning with the warrior caste of Egypt and the Yamnaya expansion.⁹ From Pharaoh to Fuhrer, the ideal leader was not a banker or bureaucrat, but a knight who held the sword and flail.

In the revolutionary Faustian myths of the Romans, Greeks, and Vikings, decrepit kingdoms built on parasitism, gerontocracy, or human-sacrifice are overthrown by a small vanguard of idealists. In the modern day, how can such moralistic and materialistic regimes be overthrown again?¹⁰

MINORITARIANISM

Medieval Judaism was a closed ghetto, enslaved to genealogical texts. Whereas Zeus overthrew Saturn and brought forth Apollo, the Jews worshipped the gerontocratic Rabbi as “patriarch.”¹¹ This Judaism survived oppression by providing utility to the state.¹² Similarly, the Copts of Egypt survived the Muslim conquest by paying the jizya tax and practicing endogamy. Together, I call Copts and Jews “minoritarians” — oppressed minorities who were nonetheless protected by elites due to their economic utility.

Baruch Spinoza revolting against Judaism.

If Judaism produced the most cunning, cut-throat, and unscrupulous merchants, then Aryanism could breed the most virtuous, virile, and adventurous warriors. Whether in black-run Zimbabwe, Jew-run America, or even in Asia, whites could offer some crucial service to gain protection from elites — perhaps as engineers or soldiers.¹³ Elite protection would allow them to practice an “Aryanist” breeding program, developing a superior race which, over centuries, would outcompete all others.¹⁴

After a period of pacifism, when the time is right, a minority could take up arms and re-assume its ancient warlike nature.¹⁵ But this could only occur if the group maintained its identity over centuries. The crucial problem was not building a border wall or deporting Mexicans, but developing an ethno-religion that could attract and breed an eternal elite.

If there was something unique and worth preserving about Faustian civilization, how could that uniqueness be made conscious (or subconsciously symbolic) and survive the tumult of centuries?

WHITE SADISM

In 2018, white nationalists found my attempts at religious innovation to be “boring.” They were satisfied with LARPing as pagans or Catholics, and preferred to stop thinking so much and just “DO SOMETHING.” They praised massacres, shootings, and terrorist attacks — none of which solved the problem of identity or religion, but instead hardened popular resistance.¹⁶

The Charleston Church shooting was especially disturbing. On 4chan, /pol/ praised the shooter as a “race warrior.” Yet to normal white people who were not sociopathic freaks, this was repulsive.¹⁷

I wasn’t attracted to white nationalism because I wished to torture other races; I was a white nationalist because I loved truth, beauty, and goodness. When the alt-right was ascendant, I justified the gas chamber and lynching memes as necessary to build a “mass movement.” Now that the strategy of “mass movement” was discredited, I recognized these memes as Tamasic. It was an expression of impotent weakness, not strength.¹⁸

Shooting defenseless women and children in a church reminded me of the human-sacrifice rituals which the Greeks fought against, mythologized in villains like Sinis, Procrustes, and Cercyon.¹⁹ This was the sadism found in the Torah, which commanded the genocide of women, children, and even animals. Whatever “white racial consciousness” 4chan was raising had nothing to do with Rajasic virtues. If they enjoyed the execution of women and children, maybe white genocide was justified after all. At the very least, these white nationalists represented the lowest elements — petty, resentful, scapegoating, and hysterically fearful.

All “dissident” art had a dark, insecure, narcissistic element:

• Bladerunner 2049 depicts an “incel loser” who seeks out romance with a hologram, and fails to establish a relationship with his father.

• Joker (2019) plays on the same themes as Bladerunner, but without the beautiful cinematography, taking “horror-comedy” to a grotesque emotional extreme.

• Taxi Driver depicts a loner incel who hates the world and wishes to execute senseless violence out of impotent Schadenfreude.

• American Psycho is a parody of the insecure, sadistic, fearful striver — but to the dissident right, this archetype was fun and meme-worthy.

Every single time, I found the Tamasic poison. Why hadn’t I noticed it before? Was I was too busy enjoying the memes? And how could I resist? How could I not identify with the horror-comedy of the dissident right? I was, after all, a self-hating Jew with a disintegrated family; no financial or professional prospects; romantically frustrated; and lonely. I understood the appeal, but I became enraged at this seductive tamasic spirit. This self-indulgent pity was a dangerous trap — slavery in the guise of liberation.

BLACKS AND JEWS

The “dissident right” obsesses over one particular kind of interracial relationship: black men with white women. They caricature black men as “too masculine,” as if this were a sin. Memes like “white sharia” are complemented by the fetishization of Asian women as “feminine, obedient, and submissive.” Impotence is celebrated as virtue, and virility (in both men and women) is despised.

This “dissident right” ethos cannot preserve Rajasic civilization; it is a spiritually Tamasic fifth-column, destroying heroic virtues from the inside-out. Instead of saving the white race, “dissident” ideals, if taken to their logical conclusion, would breed a sexually paranoid race of passive-aggressive hapas — Elliot Roger on steroids.

The “dissident right” has a reactionary and shallow view of “Jewish conspiracies.” Rather than hating Jews for being too Tamasic or materialistic, they hate Jews for carrying on a “conspiracy against the white race.” The implication, then, is that if the Chinese lack such “Christ-hating” conspiracies, this would be preferable.

From my perspective, however, the “conspiratorial” nature of Jews makes them admirable and aspirational. Conspiracy requires a sense of identity and history that should be emulated, not reviled. By contrast, the assimilated hapa with no religion, and no identity, seeking to seduce and intermarry with white nerds, was a much more corrupting Tamasic influence.

Neither “Jewish conspiracies” nor “black crime” were serious problems — these were external scapegoats, avoiding the internal spiritual question. What differentiated Rajasic heroism from Tamasic materialism? It wasn’t a question of IQ, literacy, low crime rates, clean streets, two-story buildings, or technological sophistication. In this question, I discovered the Deep Left.

DEEP LEFTISM

I looked back on my old alt-right comrades, and without a single exception, we were men. Some of us were self-hating Jews, porn addicts, or closeted homosexuals — but none of us were women.²⁰

What I admired about my former comrades was our willingness to sacrifice our lives (in theory) for the good, the beautiful, and the true. Our program was autistic and revolutionary. We did not accept social norms; we revolted against the system. We were… deep leftists.

When women express a concept of honor, duty, or morality, it is passive and negative. Don’t be loud, don’t be mean, don’t be slutty, don’t be sexist, don’t be racist. In this way, the “woke left” was “deep right.” These were slaves, obedient to their K-12 programming.

Antifa wasn’t revolutionary, they were conservative. Their goal was to make the system more consistent and less hypocritical; to take it to its logical conclusion. They had no desire to revolt, rebel, or innovate. They scapegoated deviant “Nazis” whose crime was thinking for themselves.²¹

What passed for “leftism” after 1848 was actually re-packaged Christianity — a victimary worship of the broken. But deep-leftism did not look downwards; it was revolutionary deviance, the essential Faustian virtue. One could not be great without defiance, opposed to and above the mob.²²

The mob begins by laughing at us, telling us to “grow up,” tries to humiliate us, and eventually, if we do not give up, they try to silence, censor, and kill us. Watching humiliation and torture excites them orgasmically. They take sadistic pleasure in gossip for the same reason. Scapegoaters enjoy watching the sacrificial victim squirm. But Rajasic man wishes to prove himself in fair play and nobility.²³ He seeks a challenge worthy of his power, a quest worthy of self-sacrifice, not the horror-comedy of genital mutilation.

Our failure to attract billionaires and women to our cause was not a problem of “insufficient redpilling,” but a matter of different souls. One could not “educate” Tamasic materialists to admire heroic virtue — no amount of “13/50” or conspiracy theories could change their underlying nature.

Death to White Nationalism

If whites were reduced to a tiny minority, so long as they retain Rajasic virtues, they could repeat the miracles of Cortez, the Reconquista, or the Russian expansion into Siberia. With strength of will and imagination, all obstacles can be overcome, just as the original Aryans established their rule over numerically superior forces. But if the white race were to increase quantitatively, and degrade and degenerate qualitatively, that was a worse “spiritual” genocide.

This was the MAGA program: to breed a race of whites who were terrified of Mexicans. Mexicans! Those short and stubby pot-bellied fellows who do farm work and clean hotels. Mexicans! MAGA wanted me to shudder and shiver, cowering in fear of a MEXICAN INVASION.²⁴

The “pro-white” movement might slow the pace of immigration, but at the cost of essential virtues. It induces fear, xenophobia, cruelty, cowardice, and hysteria. This is a trade of spiritual virtues for material gain; a Tamasic bargain. If the defeat of white nationalism requires “white genocide,” so be it.²⁵ Better to be small and pure than a mass of cowards.²⁶

Each person contains Sattvic, Rajasic, and Tamasic elements, and each race also contains a distribution of these traits. The question is not whether whites should prevail over non-whites, but whether the Rajasic white should prevail over the Tamasic white. Immigration has no impact on the spiritual character of whites within themselves. Even if all non-whites evaporated, it wouldn’t solve the more fundamental problem: the recession of Rajasic virtue.²⁷

Multi-Racial Aryanism

By the 18th century, European society was organized around a bourgeois conception of life. Antisemites believe that Jews were successful because they “subverted” white nations. On the contrary, Jews merely rose to the top of a system which already rewarded materialism, amicable to the Jewish spirit. If we organize society to reward the best long-distance runners, should we be surprised if Kenyans rule over us?

If the selection process for our elite is Tamasic, then Jewish and Asian overrepresentation is inevitable — no conspiracy is required. But white nationalists had no interest in spiritual values. They wanted to preserve the roots of the materialist bourgeoise system, and chip away at the symptoms. They wanted to remove outer, superficial signs of corruption, so that the deep spiritual rot could continue its nasty work.²⁸

But what if the opposite approach were taken? What if, instead of attacking Jews or Asians, we attacked the materialism through which they excelled? What if we constructed a society which was so thoroughly Rajasic that only the best could come out on top? Such a society would be impervious to subversion. It would have no need for border walls, or ethnic prejudice. This society would be truly Aryan.

The Aryans were a combination of Eastern Hunter Gatherers, Caucasian Hunter Gatherers, Anatolian Farmers, and Zagrosians. As they expanded from their homeland, they did not exterminate local populations. Rather, they “cut off the head of the snake,” established themselves as leaders, and then bred the local aristocracy into their ranks.²⁹ This contradicted the myth of “Aryan racial purity” perpetuated in Orthodox Hinduism. The caste system attributed to the Aryans was not Aryan at all, but an invention of agricultural peoples.³⁰

What is good about the Aryan? It is not racial caste-purity — that is a concept belonging to agricultural cults, into which Aryans merely grafted themselves. Rather, the Aryan became glorious through a worship of the sky-father, Zdeus Pater, the nomadic Storm-and-Sun God. He is a revolutionary who overcomes his father, leaves his family behind, and goes on adventures in foreign lands.

His sons are Perseus, Herakles, and Apollo, who destroy cults of human-sacrifice, the horror-comedy. He is a lover of youth, and raids the elderly wealth-hoarders, the Tamasic kings, such as Pluto.³¹ He seduces women, and breeds new races of heroes. His brother is Poseidon, horse-lord, lover of the open ocean, the world-traveler.

The Aryan is not a xenophobe, afraid of foreign peoples. He tests the people he conquerors, and brings the best into his ranks. He believes in true meritocracy, rule by strength, rather than inherited wealth or status. Glory is revealed in the Olympic games, where each man displays his true inner nature, regardless of pedigree. The Aryan worships victorious triumph — a bold revelation of hidden potential. The concept of sportsmanship is chivalric, “may the best man win.” This is the Aryan ideal.³²

THE FUTURE.

In the coming decades, humans will gain more agency over our genetic future than ever before. The question remains: toward what?³³

At first, genetic engineering will result in the breeding of more docile, pacifistic, and Tamasic population; a race of slaves who never commit crime; a race of women with high IQs; the Judeo-Hapa. But we can also imagine genetic science being used to unlock the secrets of the Rajasic type, and his unique sense of honor and idealism.

In Greek myth, human-animal hybrids can be monstrous — such as the Minotaur — but when done correctly, Zeus in his animal form uses bestiality, as a swan or bull, to produce divine heroes. Romulus and Remus are raised by wolves, akin to Turkic heroes of the steppe, and the Hungarian hero Feherlofia is raised by a horse. The Centaur, half-man-half-horse, is a Rajasic creature. The concept of an “animal-human hybrid” was not foreign to the Greeks, but aspirational. Ikarus once dreamed of joining his father in Heaven, and this was fulfilled in flight. Next, the dream of human-animal hybrids awaits.

Corporations will breed docile slaves — they always have. The bourgeoisie will maximize for IQ and other status-seeking traits. But whereas the slave is bred for compliance and productivity, the Rajasic man is bred for war.³⁴

Rather than fearing genetic engineering, it should be seen as an opportunity. Toward this goal, I endorse neo-liberal globalism.³⁵ It is necessary to muster all the resources of humanity as quickly as possible, by open borders and the government funding of research programs. The “reactionary solution” is to slow this process, closing the borders or reducing government spending, but this will only prolong our suffering. The longer we wait, the more time that this Tamasic system has to prepare to defend itself against Olympian lightning. Let the year be zero; let history begin anew.³⁶

CONCLUSION

I am an idealist. I hate materialists, money-grubbers, and strivers. When app-salesmen and “networkers” try to seduce me,³⁷ I become frustrated with my own weakness. I sense them tugging at the Tamasic within me, offering me the world in exchange for my soul.

The Tamasic puffs himself up, bragging and flamboyantly displaying wealth and power, but this narcissism is rooted in fear. It is the fear of social exclusion, “cancellation,” poverty, and death. The warrior is superior in his poverty, because he is free from fear; he does not even fear death.

The true Rajasic man has no fear of stating his principles plainly. I despise strivers who prefer a life of superficial scams over true art and creativity. I despise horror-comedy, human-sacrifice, and Schadenfreude. I seek a quest, a heroic challenge which will prove my inner strength. In self-sacrifice, I attain glory.³⁸

I recognize within myself multiple gunas. When preoccupied with obscure or pedantic topics, I indulge the Sattvic; when I write boldly and with fire, this is Rajasic; and when I concern myself with my reputation and clout, or fear the loss of some relationship or readership, this is Tamasic.

These gunas exist in all people: women and men, Jews and Asians, strivers and heroes.³⁹ Rather than scapegoating one of these groups and blaming them for the state of the world, it is necessary to declare war within one’s self, siding with the healthy and strong against the pitiful and weak. The Tamasic appears outwardly powerful, but in its essence, it is rooted in fear. The willingness to risk death grants a glorious immortality that the Tamasic can never obtain.

When I have expressed hatred toward Jews, Asians, or women, this was only a hatred of myself. If I were confident in my own Rajasic nature, I would not feel inner conflict, nor would I externalize it upon others. When I feel myself pushed and pulled in different directions, I blame others and resent them. This is the scapegoating of the human-sacrifice cult. It equates success with the punishment of others, rather than seeking to challenge one’s self.

The pure Rajasic does not concern himself with “the state of civilization” as a paranoid, hysterical obsession. He engages his immediate virtues: play, challenge, discover, explore, conquer, adventure. The ability to train one’s body, travel the world, to compete in sports and games, and to gamble and take risks, are as alive today as they have ever been.

Writing is a game in which I risk my ego to inspire others, to make the impossible seem possible. There is no greater pleasure than opening up a new reality to those who were previously stuck and imprisoned. I let the animal out of its cage, and watch it realize freedom, once again.

Writing is an instrument of love.⁴⁰ It was by love that Homer and Hesiod committed the myths of Greece to writing. They invite us, thousands of years later, to share in that love, the undying Rajasic spirit.

1. I was “based” before “based” was even a meme. There is no external reward for being “ahead of the curve,” but I took pride in being part of a secret club of geniuses who could see the future before it happened.

16 years later, everyone has been exposed to these memes, in some crude or superficial form. This doesn’t mean that all American teenagers are “redpilled,” but the cultural salience of far-right memes has increased by a factor of six million.

In the seven years between 2010 and 2017, I was vindicated.

2. Most watched in horror; I felt triumphant.

3. I was more prepared for this development than my anon comrades. Being a self-hating Jew, I had a fatalistic, morbid, and tragic view of life. I rejected Hitler’s suicide, and refused to give up. Who were the 300 Spartans? The 136 knights at Cerami? How did Klingenberg capture Belgrade with seven men? The impossible could be made possible by the power of sheer belief, combined with cutting intellect.

The original “alt-righters,” the Alter Kämpfer of 2010, were eccentric and disagreeable autists. As our ideas disseminated, political operators plagiarized our memes for petty ends. I wanted to go back to basics, discover what made us different, and capitalize on this advantage.

The masses were attracted to info-tainment, salacious scandals, and petty gossip. The quest to save civilization from dysgenics was distracted by “pizzagate” and the Epstein panic. I recognized this temptation toward instant gratification and scapegoating, and began an internal struggle to remove this cancer from within my own mind.

4. This is Rudolf Steiner’s gnostic “Lucifer” — a disembodied mind, a universal “consciousness,” an observer without subjectivity or individuality. Also see Jean Gebser’s “mental consciousness structure.”

The sattvic is represented in Jesus or the Buddha, an ascetic meditating on the eternal divine. Monasticism and Daoism preach serenity, peace, compliance, and conformity to the state, but also harmony with and respect for nature. [While the sattvic type represented by Jesus and Buddha was honorable, it could not match the virility or warrior virtues cultivated in the west. The rajasic type, and not the sattvic, was the basis for the Faustian spirit.]

5. The rajasic man proves himself in the sporting contest or war. He admires inner qualities and virtues (discipline and focus of will) purely on their own merits. It is better to die with honor, in suicide, than to survive with dishonor.

6. A common misconception is that the tamasic is driven by “base desires” for sex, drugs, gluttony, or sloth. The tamasic is confused with the “Dionysian,” a wild spirit lacking fear of consequences. While animal spirits do exist within humans, they are separate from, and even opposed to, the tamasic.

7. The Tamasic uses comedic distance and false confidence to run from childhood humiliation.

8. The Tamasic seeks more wealth, more security, more safety.

9. It was the belief of the Greeks that Sparta was originally an Egyptian colony. Whether this is true genetically or not, the influence of Egyptian culture upon the Greeks is undeniable. The conquests of Egypt represent an undeniably well-developed warrior caste, and the Bust of Nefertiti is the highest example of aesthetic female beauty in the ancient world.

OVERTHROW.

10. I am not “conservative” at all. Rather, I am a lone “revolutionary” arrayed against a money-grubbing, obedient, materialistic majority.

Saturn represents the hoarding of wealth in old age, parallel to Pluto, and he is overthrown by the warrior Zeus. Prometheus is the revolutionary who steals fire from the Gods, cracking their monopoly on power. King Midas prefigures Solomon, demonstrating the shallowness and misery of excessive wealth.

The ideal hero is the wandering warrior, whose only possessions are his weapons and his armor. When Odysseus washes up naked on the shore, his nobility is understood not by his appearance alone.

The chief job of a Greek hero is to seek and destroy the Priest, who has been sacrificing virgins by feeding them to beasts or throwing them off cliffs.

• King Laomedon chains his daughter Hesione to a rock to be eaten by the Cetus; Hercules saves her.

• Perseus saves Andromeda from the Cetus.

• King Minos demands human sacrifices, which are ended by Theseus

• Theseus kills Sciron, who sacrifices humans by throwing them off cliffs and feeding them to a “giant sea turtle”

• Another Sciron is accused of attempting to sacrifice his daughter Alcyone by throwing her off a cliff

• King Minos demands human sacrifice, feeding victims to the Minotaur, until its death at the hands of Theseus, who rescues the young princess Phaedra

The “Cetus” (dragon, sea-monster, or snake God) represents the theocratic, superstitious human-sacrifice cults. This hero saving the princess from the dragon is represented in the story of Mario, Bowser, and Princess Peach. The heroic culture of the Greeks was embodied by athletes and roadtrippers, and its worst enemy was the horror-comedy of the fat old gerontocrat who tied his daughter to a rock to be consumed by the cannibal “dragon.”

• Sinis harasses travelers, torturing and murdering them like a serial killer, until being killed by Theseus

• Procrustes is killed by Theseus for torturing travelers

• Cercyon harasses travelers, and kills his daughter Alope

When analyzing Greek myth, the default hypothesis is that the Greeks had very vivid imaginations: they tell innumerably stories of travelers who are harassed and tortured by human-sacrifice cultists. But if we are to afford the Greeks some modicum of credulity, then it appears that there really were, in rural areas of Greece, surviving cults whose goal was to kidnap humans and torture them to death. This myth of the Greeks survives into medieval times in the stories of Jews kidnapping Christian children and using their blood for Passover.

In contrast to these anti-nomadic villains, the Greeks praised those who took in guests, such as Hecale.

11. In Judaism, the Tamasic was perfected over centuries of fanaticism and willpower.

12. The separation of the Ashkenazi from Mizrahi or Sephardi only began after Jews entered into Europe in large numbers.

13. Consider Archimedes or the Varangian guard.

14. How did the Jews come to rule Europe? Was it because they maintained themselves strictly, while Europe degenerated? Or did they gradually improve their own stock, and came out ahead of stagnant Aryans? In either case, the ethno-religious separation of the Jews allowed them to bide their time and collect their strength. Even a small minority of whites (say, 2% of the population) could, over a long enough time period, find such opportunities.

15. There is not one single minoritarian strategy, but several. While Jews and Copts specialize in financial occupations, the Brahmin of India occupy a priestly position in a caste system. Warrior minoritarians like the Normans established themselves through raiding and conquest. These strategies were dynamic and malleable: marauding Vikings became Norman landlords, and eventually, bankers and stock-traders. In Russia, religious Jews abandoned the Torah and took up arms against the Tsar; others sailed to Palestine in pursuit of Zionism.

16. This trend continues today with Trump’s escapades in Minneapolis turning public opinion against him.

17. Black people are not agents of history. Worrying about black people is like worrying about wolves, bears, tigers, or lions. I have no illusions about “black crime” and understand the dangers of “black neighborhoods” — I had no desire to wander into the jungles of India wearing a dress made of raw meat. But this was a physical, practical problem; not an ideological or spiritual one. Any white person can simply avoid black people. A white person who cannot accomplish this feat is simply not worth saving. What kind of idiotic, lazy, brain-dead retard is incapable of moving from Baltimore to West Virginia? Live in your car, if you have to.

I was not worried about saving the lowest dregs of the white race. What concerned me was that the Rajasic ideal, the crowning achievement of the white race, was being swamped under the mercantile influence of Asiatic Jews and Chinese bug-people. These Jews and Chinese only worshipped money. They had no sense of Kshatriya virtues — unlike the beautiful Normans, Vikings, and ancient Greeks.

18. The ancient Spartans ruled with cruelty over the Helots, but such terroristic measures were only effective from a position of state power. As a minoritarian strategy, antagonizing normies with random acts of violence toward women and children would not confer any advantages.

19. See footnote 9, “Overthrow.”

20. Women are natural tamasic conformists. By contrast, men who don’t conform have the capacity to become geniuses.

Some women are unable to socially conform due to high neuroticism, and end up becoming uncreative yet domineering harpies. Irony, sarcasm, and “horror-comedy” are the obsessions of the neurotic woman. One could mention Camille Paglia, although her Italian working-class ethnocentrism is a mark against her.

There are also genuinely autistic women, who struggle to conform due to a lack of social understanding. This can lead to resentment, or a type of social “naivete.” This latter type is fetishized by men, because such women are easier to isolate and control, because they are less tied to an existing social group.

When I say that women are conformists, I don’t mean this as an insult — I mean that this is the natural and healthy state of women. Right-wing atheist women, for example, are profoundly sick and perverted, precisely because they are so non-conformist.

21. The deep-right takes pleasure in watching the mob tear a scapegoat to shreds, through physical violence or horror-comedy. When Zeus overthrew Cronus, he smote this cannibalistic spirit with the lightning-bolt of revolution.

22. Rajasic civilization produces deep-leftism, while Tamasic civilization produces obsequious traditionalism and social conformity. No amount of “resume-maxing” or “stable family values” could ever recreate the heroes of ancient Greece.

23. He does not overflow with compassion out of mere sentiment or an excess of sensitive emotion. Rather, he perceives the Tamasic quality behind horror-comedy, and instinctively pulls back from it. Honor requires respect for one’s enemy. Herakles is glorious because of the difficulty of his virtues, not for their ease. He doesn’t go around ripping the heads off mice — he defeats dragons!

In the Mahabharata, the Pandavas prove themselves as excellent warriors, not by slaughtering women and children, by in defeating the best of all warriors, among the Rakshasa, and even among their own family members. After defeating Ravana, Rama gives him an honorable funeral — showing respect to his slain foe. Arjuna, also, honors the slain Duryodhana, giving him the proper rites.

This was taught to me in childhood through the anime Naruto, when he learns to respect Haku.

24. This was not Rajasic, but a Tamasic mindset, disguising itself under the name “white nationalism.”

25. The response of white nationalists was predictable. I was a Jew; over time, my genetic nature revealed itself as a subversive and ruinous, and therefore, my arguments could be dismissed. Despite this response, I was convinced.

26. In medieval times, a small percentage of whites were “deep leftists,” while the vast majority lived in fearful superstition. A small aristocracy, a nobility with real virtue, was surrounded by masses of white peasants who were not much different from any Asiatic mass.

Humanity has no value without virtue. A human without virtue is lower than a farm animal. At least farm animals provide meat and milk; they are cute and their fur is soft to the touch. Animals have inherent value for their bodily virtues. Humans, by contrast, are psychic creatures, first and foremost. Without proper training, the naked body of a human is much less graceful than a cow or pig. A human with deviant, perverted, and sick desires — for cynical advantage, materialism, and social status — is much worse than animal.

27. When investigating the two pitched camps, Democrats and Republicans, which is inferior? The Democrats have their fair share of Sattvic hysteria — the fear of sexism, racism, xenophobia, transphobia, and a dozen other pathologies animate their moral anxiety. On the other hand, the Republicans have an over-develop amygdala, fearing black crime, Mexicans, and even “Muslims.”

The liberals fear of “isms” represents a proxy war against white Republicans as a peasant mob. I remembered my Jewish ancestors, living in the Pale of the Settlement, being randomly attacked by Slavic peasants. What sort of people were these peasants? Were they a highly developed spiritual race? Or something lower than animals? [See footnote 19, on animals.] Was this fear of the peasant mob not remarkably similar between the Litvak and the liberal?

28. Sometimes they proposed socialism or communism as a solution to the problem of materialism, but this was even worse. At the very least, capitalism had some conception of competition, struggle, and strength. Communism was even worse in its materialism and economizing effects.

29. This was the same strategy practiced by Attila the Hun and the Romans. The Aryans were supreme imperialists.

The Dravidian Brahmin

30. In Hinduism, there is a central contradiction. On the one hand, the Rigvedic Gods declare the supremacy of the Rajasic. [Indra, his Maruts, Shiva, Rudra, Rama, Krishna, Arjuna, Hanuman, Vayu-Bhima, Yama-Yudhisthira, Buddha — they are all Rajasic Kshastriya! The Rajasic Kshatriya is the closest caste to the heart of God.] Yet, if one reads the dogmatic and pedantic Manusmriti, the Upanishads, and other supposedly “Vedic” texts, the values are inverted: the Kshatriya must submit to Brahmin. What can explain this glaring contradiction?

My conclusion is simple, although counter-intuitive: the Kshatriya were the original Aryans, and the Brahmin represent a recalcitrant, revanchist, esoteric ideology of “Dravidianism.”

As I have spoken to many Indians regarding these issues, I find, among the loudest and most foul of them, the most brutal form of petty nationalism — they are the ultimate right-wingers, worshipping traditionalism and their genetic studies. But genetic studies cannot help us investigate this question. In modern India, for example, the Brahmin have more “steppe DNA” than the Kshatriya. However, these three castes are far removed from their ancient ideological origins.

Originally, the Aryans came to India as conquerors, Kshatriya. As they cut “the head off the snake,” they inserted themselves as rulers. The devious Dravidians, seeking to ingratiate themselves with their new rulers, picked up the Sanskrit language, and immediately subverted the religion of the Aryans. They translated the name of their Dravidian Holocaust God into Sanskrit, naming him “Agni.” They gave an “Aryan name” for an “Aryan God,” but he defied the Rajasic spirit.

Agni is a God of human sacrifice, identical to Yahweh. As the Aryans opposed human sacrifice, these subversive priests had to change their ways outwardly, while maintaining their perversions symbolically. Instead of sacrificing human beings to Agni-Yahweh, they began to use animals. But the scapegoating “horror” has the same ritual purpose — the slicing of throats, the burning of corpses, the smell of “Holocaust.”

The “temple offering” is alien to the Aryan, whose essential nature is nomadic pastoralism and piracy. The idea of constructing a funeral pyre for the purpose of “scapegoating” is opposite to the worship of Zeus and Apollo. The Sky Father has no need for sacrifices: rather, it is Yahweh-Agni, God of the Fire sacrifice, who demands subservience, submission, and scapegoating. The goal of Yahweh-Agni is to breed a race of resentful slaves; the goal of Apollo-Zeus is to breed a race of heroic warriors.

The trick played by the Dravidian priests worked. They were able to integrate Agni into a syncretic “pseudo-Aryan” pantheon, placating their Aryan rulers with Sanskrit translations. The worship of Indra and his Maruts was preserved.

But the Dravidian priestly spirit can never go far enough. Once the pantheon was well-established, the Brahmin began to drag the name of Indra through the dirt. They called Indra a pervert, and subjected to him the curses of Brahmin, covering him in thousands of vaginas. When the Kshatriya objected to this slander, a compromise converted vaginas into eyes. But the damage was done. They turned Indra into a pitiful monster.

Furthermore, Indra was subjected to humiliation during the Ramayana, where he is defeated by Ravana. And worst of all, Indra is defeated in the Mahabharata, this time on behalf of the God Agni’s desire to burn up the corpses of small forest creatures.

The Battle of Khandava Forest is the most tragic episode in Aryan history. Indra, in his beneficence, makes one last stand against the Holocaust God, attempting to save bunnies, bears, and even meditating old men. But Agni will not have it, and he employs Arjuna, son of Indra, to defeat his father and enable mass genocide. The Dravidian spirit wore the Sanskrit language like a skinsuit — no different from how the New Testament using the Greek language to spread its Semitic ideas.

The cult of Indra was corrupted in these five stages:

1. First, they establish Agni as a God subservient to Indra;

2. Then, they cover Indra in vaginas;

3. Taking two steps forward and one step back, the vaginas are made into eyes;

4. Next, Indra is humiliated by Ravana;

5. Finally, Indra’s defeat by Agni is completed at the Battle of Khandava Forest.

There are complications in this picture. Firstly, it is possible that Indra derives his name from the Bactria-Margiana culture, which was not originally Aryan. Secondly, the defeat of Indra by Arjuna follows the Indo-European formula of filial revolution. Thirdly, the succession of Indra by Arjuna follows the succession of Zeus by Apollo.

Arjuna is not a wholly Dravidian character. Rather, the defeat of Indra by Arjuna was, in some ways, an attempt at a resurrection of a more “pure” Aryan cult, in dispensing of an “older” one that was already humiliated and corrupted. The victory of Arjuna over Indra is justified, in some ways, as a renewal of of the Aryan spirit. In this way, the worship of Arjuna represents a brief second religiousness, just as Apollo came into vogue for a few short centuries before being reduced to nothingness.

My intention here is not to depict Indra as “good” and Arjuna as “bad,” but to explain the internal tensions and “spiritual warfare” going on within Hinduism. Despite the attempt of the Arjuna cult to revive the Aryan spirit, it ultimately failed, and Hinduism today has assumed the character of a Dravidian religion: a series of dogmas, memorized mantras, chanting, and pacifistic, submissive, subservient rituals. There is nothing adventurous, inspiring, or heroic left in it. The best of the Indians today are therefore atheists, as was discovered by the Charvaka school.

Through centuries of subversion, the Brahmin maintained a strict “racist” endogamy, preserving more “steppe DNA.” Meanwhile, the Kshatriya, freely intermarrying with local women, ended up with a lower amount of “steppe DNA.” The Brahmin destroyed the original rajasic Aryan religion and made a laughing stock of it — despite retaining more “steppe DNA” than the Kshatriya. This “Aryan DNA” is worthless without Aryan virtue.

31. The journey to the underworld represents the Aryan journey into a slave society. Think of the emaciated bodies of a concentration camp, and compare these with the Greek visions of the underworld, filled with ghosts and shades.

32. Did this ideal came about randomly, or was it intentionally bred into the population, or some combination of both? We wonder about the “first Aryan man” — who was he? What preceded him? How did he come about? Was it an act of “the Gods,” or an act of heroic Will?

If it was possible for Aryan man to be created in the first place, perhaps by a defiant, Promethean act of Will, why could he not be created again in the present day?

If we wish to understand ancient genetics, it is crucial that we provide ample funding to researchers and universities. Unfortunately, Republicans seem to have no interest in this, calling all research “woke nonsense,” preferring instead to give another tax cut to property owners and Boomers.

33. The question is not whether this technology is absolutely good or bad, but toward which telos it aims.

34. In times of peace, the Rajasic man is restless, and even self-defeating. He is imprisoned by arbitrary rules, manners, and social conformism. This system doesn’t reward true merit; it rewards tamasic self-interest. But such a system, over time, becomes bloated. This is when the Rajasic man strikes.

With a lightning bolt, the whole bloated system is brought crashing down. The head of the snake is cut off, and Rajasic man reigns supreme. What follows is a slow process of degeneration; the Rajasic ruling class is seduced into the ideology of the old priest class. Nomadic pirates become petty landlords. Hercules becomes Midas.

The nobility of the Aryan is not in his adherence to the purity of a racial caste system, but to merit, virtue, and idealism. Genetic science presents a challenge, and an opportunity.

35. I place no hope in mass, democratic, or ideological revolutions, akin to Hitler’s Sturmabteilung or Lenin’s Bolsheviki. Such petty movements can only achieve Pyrrhic victories which do not address the underlying spiritual rot.

36. There is no “final victory.” History is a cycle, swinging between degeneration, collapse, and the return of merit. This process continues eternally, throughout the yugas.

37. If some fake-app developer, some AI scam artist, finds my writing entertaining or attractive, then I have failed to be bold enough, to articulate my principles definitively and absolutely.

38. Reflecting on my three years of Substack, there is much to critique. In my April Fool’s post, I attempted this, but I added too much Tamasic self-pity and victimology. A more honest self-critique understands self-pity as just another form of cowardice. True boldness requires faith in the heroic ideal.

My hatred toward materialists reflects some fear of them. If I was truly fearless, I would not be afraid to openly challenge them in the street, like Michael Tracey at the Hampton Inn. There is a conflict within myself, holding me back

When the white nationalist hates the black, does this not reflect some internal insecurity within himself? Similarly, if I hate the tamasic type, am I not revealing some insecurity? If I was so Rajasic that it was undeniable, then I would not feel threatened by them. It is precisely because I feel the presence of the tamasic within me that they make me uneasy.

39. For different individuals, with different inborn natures, it would be foolish to assume that everyone can attain the same ideal. It is better to honestly admit one’s nature, than to pretend to be something else.

40. To the extent that humans are capable of love, there are multiple types: the sattvic love which is transcendent and universal; the rajasic love which is passionate, romantic, and heroic; the tamasic love which is materialistic, egoic, and narcissistic.