Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

>I am predicting that Hispanic culture bends towards the norm of South Texas, and white culture bends towards the norm of Vermont. Hispanics are assimilating into working-class white culture, while whites are becoming more educated and liberal over time.

Actually, I'm not sure about this. On the ground level I have noticed an absence of hispanics in uni, but I recollect an old Alt Hype video where he mentions that minorities are actually more enthusiastic about college than White people. This seems backed by the data.

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/coe_cpb.pdf

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_rea.asp

Hispanics steadily increased their college participation rate over the past 2 decades, while Whites have stayed fairly constant. If Colleges continue to decline in prestige, and colleges continue to be liberal, then they will continue to become browner even if racial preferences in admissions have been prohibited on paper.

Also, White people are not going to become more like Vermont because White Vermontese don't have enough kids. In fact, educated White people in general are vastly below replacement while White conservatives are actually among the more fertile groups in the country. Political views are mostly explained by genetics and family upbringing, so it is reasonable to assume that each subsequent generation will be genetically more conservative. Not to mention, stupider. Because, you know, that's also highly heritable and selected for (among all races). So, less college-goers.

>More Americans are going to college than ever before, but the type of degree they obtain is changing. In the 1960s, the ratio of STEM degrees to non-STEM degrees was 1:2. Now, it is closer to 1:9. This dramatic shift, which doesn’t seem to be slowing down, has political implications.

I'm glad someone pointed this out! STEM majors have a long history of being more Republican (or more accurately, more centrist than the uber-lib humanities)

>America is recreating a clerical hierarchy to rival the medieval world. Just as 10% of medieval GDP went to the church, 10% of modern GDP is going to DEI. This isn’t “productive labor,” but neither was monastic prayer. It is “moral labor” which holds the social fabric together on a non-rational basis.

I recall listening to a lecture on Neo-Confucianism. The saying of the Buddha-Skeptics went something like this: "Back in the day, there were four social classes and four corresponding households -- the bureaucrats, the blacksmiths, the farmers, and the merchants. Now there are six social classes -- the bureaucrats, the blacksmiths, the farmers, the merchants, the Buddhist monks, and the Taoist monks. We are now feeding two more households with the same amount of grain". Because, you know, the Blacksmith gave in return for food something tangible, while the Monk gave nothing in particular in return to the peasant, and something intangible to the curious well-to-do man. Before the Buddhists came, the scholars and the bureaucrats were the same class. The people who were writing poetry and operating government, who were discussing metaphysics and were managing irrigation, were the same people. This is how it was in China. In Europe, it was the captains of the battlefield and the burghers who were simultaneously philosophers. But suddenly this class of "professional introspective people" came about and their sole purpose was spreading the meme of Buddhism or Taoism. Not necessarily a bad thing -- if you're a Buddhist aristocrat, it makes sense to consider this the greatest possible use of your leftover coinage. But, it is quite similar to the "cathedral" in modern Amerikwa.

Monasteries were a little bit more productive. Monks did produce a lot of value in the economy, because they didn't really have much to do but work. And they became extremely wealthy, because the money of the monastery stayed in the monastery. You couldn't "invest" in it. You don't get a dime if you take off the robes, and you can't give anything to your illegitimate children if you have any. Monks didn't spend all of their time meditating or praying, they also did some practical inquiry and that's why half of Europe's great cheeses come from some monastery (lol) among other things.

Not sure what the Buddhist monks were up to. Probably training for the Tenkaichi Budōkai. On your topic of the English population, I think it's because the Black Plague kept coming in waves for a century or two after the "big one" ~1350. Also, the hundred-years war. coincided with the first few bad bouts of plague, making the crash even worse.

>Because whites and Jews are more neurotic than non-whites

Not sure if this is true. Whites are more depressed than non-whites and maybe on paper more anxious, but a lot of evopsych people talk about how neuroticism is r-selected and beneficial in such environments. Not fully on board with r-K in humans but their arguments made sense that being a neurotic is quite beneficial in a low-IQ, low-trust society.

Expand full comment
Christos Raxiotis's avatar

Gdp growth,techno optimism and beneficial AI implementation could become the new right religion with youth being less religious.Ramaswamy and Musk promoting Emil type hereditarians might attract east Asian EHC in the coming years,they did get both Bezos and Zuck to disassociate with the Dems, they have a chance winning the culture war.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts