the wigger-right does not understand "per capita."

"you sound woke."

When I tell conservatives that the murder of Charlie Kirk is anecdotal, and not predictive of a “wave of violence,” they have responded by claiming that I am a sociopath who wants to kill them. I consider this to be wigger behavior, not because they are dumb, but because they are xenophobic, narcissistic, and hysterical. Their emotional profile prevents them from logically thinking about the world, and they see everyone who doesn’t kiss their feet as a potential murderer.

Compare the response of the right-wing to the Kirk assassination to the response of the left-wing to the Hortman assassination in June. There were no calls from mainstream Democrats to “hunt down the right” and “get revenge.” Contrast this to the response of the right-wing, which is to call for the deaths of teenagers making cruel jokes in a Discord server, on the basis that their jokes constitute “involvement.”

source

How did we get to this point?

Back in 2017, in the wake of Charlottesville, the far-right (then called the alt-right) was divided into two camps.

One camp, called the Wignats, said that America was dead, and it was necessary to advocate for the breakup of the United States on racial lines. This was a classic white nationalist position, going back to Harold Covington’s northwest imperative. They believed that by engaging in extreme street performances (activism) and scaring normal people, they could attract a “hardcore” following which would prepare for the inevitable collapse.

Opposed to the Wignats were the American Nationalists. These AmNats claimed that multi-racial societies work just fine — look at Hawaii or Brazil. The AmNats didn’t believe a collapse was coming, and therefore, trying to scare normal people in preparation of Ragnarok was a dumb idea. Instead, white nationalists should adopt a Straussian tactic of appearing to be normal conservatives, while maintaining their explicitly racist and anti-Zionist views.

The Wignats lost a series of humiliating defeats, getting beaten up by antifa in street battles, having their personal dirty laundry aired,¹ and having their leadership turn in membership lists to the SPLC and other anti-hate organizations. The AmNats, led by Nick Fuentes, has gone from strength to strength, with a huge list of accomplishments:

1. The Groyper War

2. Meeting Trump

3. Kanye on Infowars

4. Beefing with Tucker

Nick’s eulogy for Charlie Kirk has 2 million views. From a totally cynical perspective, Charlie was Nick’s moderate opposition. The violence against Charlie will radicalize Charlie’s audience, driving them into Nick’s arms.

But the victory of the AmNats over the WigNats has been pyrrhic, because in the process, the mainstream right has adopted the retardation of wiggers.

I use the term “wigger” in the original derogatory, racist sense, to mean, “white people who act like black nationalists.” Specifically:

• Obsessed with race, all of their self-esteem and pride comes from race

• Belief that there is a conspiracy to genocide them by “elites”

• Their default position is to believe conspiracies and dismiss statistics

• Hysterical, believe people should die for the crime of disrespecting their race

• They do not understand the concept of “per capita.” In a country of 350 million, a single assassination does not constitute a “wave of violence.” By historical standards, BLM was relatively peaceful, compared to the 1960s or 1970s.

Not all black people are black nationalists, and there is a spectrum of behavior. For example, when I went to the immigration protest in Toronto, I found more black people on the conservative side than on the leftist side. Still, in America,

27% of African Americans endorsed the belief that “HIV/AIDS is a man-made virus that the federal government made to kill and wipe out black people”, and a further 23% were unsure. (2006)

The Tuskegee experiments were real. It is understandable why black nationalists would be suspicious of the government, and more willing to believe wild, unsubstantiated claims. The end result is that 50% of black people are open to the frightening idea of AIDS being an anti-black bioweapon.

If we could somehow convince black nationalists this wasn’t true, they would just move on to some other conspiracy theory. The problem isn’t the specific theory, but the underlying traits of epistemic nihilism which attracts black nationalists to crazy theories.

To give you another example:

source

In my last article, I briefly mentioned the fact that rooftop Koreans were broadly celebrated and rarely condemned in the wake of the LA Riots. The Democratic Party of 1992 was qualitatively different from the BLM-endorsers of 2020. My argument is that, when we look at the broader history of political shifts in America, if it is possible for Democrats to “go woke” on black crime, it is also possible to shift back.

But the telos of my argument was entirely ignored, because this black nationalist became racially triggered and hyper-focused on some minor point. I do not know anything about the rooftop Koreans besides their popular conception. Is it possible that they murdered people unjustly? That they were racist? Sure, it’s possible, but in the grand scheme of things, why are we keeping some petty racial scoreboard over incidents from 33 years ago? Don’t we have bigger problems to solve?

The disease afflicting the black community is black crime, and the only way to address that is with severe policing. By constantly complaining about Koreans defending their property, and calling them racist, we only get further from the solution (policing) and farther toward the problem (BLM, defund the police).

Black crime does not affect me personally. To the extent that black people target outgroups, it is against those that they feel are easy victims, like Asians, the elderly, or Ukrainian women.

But black crime worries and radicalizes conservatives. When people like Matt Walsh and Nick Fuentes rant and rave about the evils of black crime, this grants the right-wing more legitimacy. If you remove black crime from the political equation, there isn’t much of a constituency for Catholic theocracy, abortion bans, or erasing gays from public life. Black crime is the life raft of a sinking political project. Address that problem, and you sink the lift raft.

Black people are only 13% of the population, and their voting patterns don’t change. Black politics are not dynamic, and therefore, not something worth talking about outside of the internal primaries within the Democratic Party.

When white people begin acting like black nationalists, however, this becomes a big deal. Since the race riots of 1919, and the fall of the KKK in 1924, white people have collectively agreed (from the top-down) to stop organizing racial violence.

We can turn to the Washington Post to bolster the conspiracy theories of black nationalists, who claim that “lynchings never stopped.” Their evidence for this is that the police are covering up lynchings by claiming they are suicides.

It is true that after the 1930s, there were some isolated incidents of white racial violence, like the 1944 Agana Riot, or the lynching of Emmet Till in 1955. But by and large, if a white woman is raped by a black man, there is no lynching.

In response to these arguments, black nationalists claim that the police themselves are carrying out a black genocide. This is a very easy claim to dismiss.

Compare the number of blacks killed by cops to the blacks killed by blacks. Note that many cops are black, especially in black neighborhood, and a disproportionate number of ambiguous police shootings involve black officers.

In this data from 2006, when black officers shot civilians, those civilians were much less likely to be carrying a weapon than when white officers shot civilians. Black officers were more trigger happy, while white officers were more discriminating. The fact that black officers have lower shootings overall is due to the fact that they are less willing to engage with criminals.²

If white cops were not policing black neighborhoods, this would lead to an exponential rise in black crime. Since a majority of those blacks shot by white cops possessed weapons (81%), “death by cop” is saving black lives by lowering the black murder rate. This is not genocide.

I am in favor of massive foreign aid to Africa. I want black people to be helped, and I think their lives matter. But that black nationalism inverts the benefits of policing by falsely claiming it is part of a program of black genocide. Similarly, the wigger-right hurts white people through protectionist policies that sap growth and put us on the path toward stagnation.

Overall, because whites are more impactful than blacks, the wigger-right is more dangerous than black nationalism, and contains all the same characteristics.

source

Consider this deranged comment by John K. I posted a very funny meme of JFK, RFK Sr, MLK, Malcom X, and Charlie Kirk. The joke was that all of these people are on the same side, because as we all know, everyone who is assassinated has the correct opinions, and if you argue against those opinions, you are pro-assassination.

John, apparently not knowing any of the people in the image, thought that I was threatening to assassinate these long-dead men.

I do not think John is too stupid to understand my joke, in theory. If I were a conservative, and I made a joke against Democrats, he would probably expend the neural activity needed to interpret the joke correctly. But John is so tribalistic, that his emotions overwhelm him, and he defaults to an NPC-like series of mantras about how “everyone on the left wants to kill me.”

John has defaulted to NPC mode, he left several comments repeating this

As more white people become wigger-rightists, they become more hysterical, less logical, and less willing to extend good faith to their opponents.

If I were John, and I thought that the average leftist wanted to kill me, not as a theoretical joke, but as a real and present danger to my life and to my family, I would do something illegal, immoral, and stupid. Thankfully, I do not believe that. But does John?

Both black nationalists and wigger-rightists fail to understand the concept of per capita. The fact that one leftist killed Charlie Kirk does not make all leftists violent murderers.

source

Their failure to understand is exactly for the same reason that black nationalists can’t honestly engage with police shooting statistics. Both sides are consumed by a tribalistic, narcissistic, hysterical rage, and if you try to confront them with facts, they view it as a threat on their life. Black nationalists claim that denying black genocide “is a form of violence.” Now, the wigger-right claims that posting per-capita crime statistics “is a form of violence.”

Conclusion

Black nationalists and the wigger-right have the same mentality, but each present a different threat to society at large. Black people are a small disenfranchised minority. BLM accomplished nothing: no reparations, no reduction in crime, no increase in test scores. The net political impact of black activism is nil. I would argue, at this point, that Arab Americans are a more impactful political demographic than all black Americans put together.

White people, on the other hand, are a dynamic group who determine the outcomes of elections. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was white on white violence. White violence matters more, and white hysteria matters more, because white people have greater numbers and greater ability to enact violence than any other group.

This is why the FBI has designated white terrorism as the greatest threat to the state. It’s not because the FBI is anti-white, but because the FBI is honest.

BLM was an organized phenomenon. It was granted legitimacy by the Democratic Party and allowed to persist by a lack of state intervention. I am hopeful that the Democratic Party has learned their lesson, that you cannot foment vandalism and chaos without being punished for it at the ballot box.

Republicans, on the other hand, haven’t learned any lesson from January 6th. Trump was re-elected, and he pardoned all the criminals. The incentives here are looking bad for the future of the Republican Party.

Optimistically, JD Vance will take over the Republican Party in 2028 and Make Republicans Boring Again. He will focus on tax cuts, prayer in schools, and stopping 282 mentally ill teenage girls from chopping off their breasts. Pessimistically, Vance will continue Trump’s war on trade, immigration, foreign aid, and become more aggressively isolationist.

The result will be a rise in global conflict, which he can then use as an excuse for further isolation: “it’s a crazy world out there, and Americans should just stay out of it!” It’s very plausible that the xenophobic narcissism of the wigger-right will result in millions of deaths.

I can debate with conservatives on policy. But when conservatives believe that every leftist secretly wants to kill them, this makes debate impossible. When I try to show statistics proving that this isn’t the case, they act like black nationalists, alleging that statistics are in themselves “insensitive.” When debate is impossible, further violence becomes inevitable.

I would prefer a return to the Romney-right, or even the Bush-right. Until then, I will continue to hope for a reform of the left to counter this dangerous phenomenon.

1. (I will always defend perverts, but these were “family values conservatives” being hypocrites)

2. (less willing to do their jobs and put themselves in danger; showing up late to crime scenes; avoiding confrontation)