A lot of this article is kind of not even wrong because you are mixed up about the difference between Charedim and Religious Zionism, which is kind of an entry level distinction. I'm surprised tbh.
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
I’m not expert on Israeli politics, but my sense is that people most likely to want to nuke Gaza aren’t the Haredi, but the slightly more secular than haredi.
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
I think your idea that in the future Saudi Arabia will be more secular than Israel in the future is even more true for Iran. Might even already be the case if you just count society and not the government
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
A secular, liberal Jewish state has always been an oxymoron. Secular liberal Jews become that way by assimilating with the goyim as much as they can. An ethnostate that requires ethnically cleansing the original population and permanent war with all its neighbors...is not this.
A lot of this article is kind of not even wrong because you are mixed up about the difference between Charedim and Religious Zionism, which is kind of an entry level distinction. I'm surprised tbh.
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
I’m not expert on Israeli politics, but my sense is that people most likely to want to nuke Gaza aren’t the Haredi, but the slightly more secular than haredi.
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
Most coherent post to date, keep it up
unfortunately I cannot
I think your idea that in the future Saudi Arabia will be more secular than Israel in the future is even more true for Iran. Might even already be the case if you just count society and not the government
Iran is already more secular, if you measure religiousness by birth rate.
As a matter of ideology, Hareidi political parties are'nt theocratic.
The fundamental idea behind Hareiism is theological opposition to the jewish state.
They might have some ideas fitting in the venn diagram with theocrats but they refuse to rule.
The distinction is in the process of collapsing. As Charedi take more power, they will come to identify with the state; additionally, as Charedi undergo "shedding" (secularization at the margins), they will produce more Religious Zionists. I write in the present-future tense.
A secular, liberal Jewish state has always been an oxymoron. Secular liberal Jews become that way by assimilating with the goyim as much as they can. An ethnostate that requires ethnically cleansing the original population and permanent war with all its neighbors...is not this.
i think that second-to-last sentence (“It future of the Middle East . . .”) got a little mangled
"the" not "it"