We have not died, because we have the power of the Germanic soul, which thus far has prevented the final victory of Rome and Jerusalem.
Alfred Rosenberg wrote a book.1 It is basically the only thing he ever did. His participation in WWII was limited and his subordinates acted freely without paying much attention to him. He was not lying at Nuremberg when he said,
âThe [criminal] practice of the German state leadership during the war, which was proven here in the trial, was completely different from my opinion⌠This was not the implementation of National Socialism, for which millions of faithful men and women had fought, but its shameful abuse, a degeneration that I also deeply condemn.â
The fact that he was executed, despite being less guilty of war crimes than someone like Albert Speer, indicates that the book he wrote was very dangerous. Perhaps even more dangerous than Mein Kampf.
Itâs about 400 pages. What I have done here is to select the most important quotes and modified them for clarity.
The basis for my abridgement comes from the English translation by James Whisker, who appears to have been a Catholic and supporter of American militias and the second amendment. I was not able to find much information about Peter Peel, who wrote the polemical introduction. The publication was brought forward by Noontide Press, the Barnes Review, Willis Cartoâs outlet.
If you want to understand National Socialism, I am a strong believer in primary sources. Besides Mein Kampf, almost no one bothers to read primary sources.
There are many secondary source claims regarding Hitler. Richard Hanania has commented that, as a result of Hitler having a small penis,
Itâs looking increasingly likely that the greatest war in Western history was the direct result of one manâs sexual frustrations and insecurities. This is an incredible win for the Freudians and Critical Theory types.2
Personally, I am a freak, so the idea that Hitler was also a freak is not exactly dissuading to me, regarding my judgment of the merits or evils of Nazi ideology. If Hitler was a biological castrati, incapable of having sex, it would make his relationship with Eva Braun even more impressive. The woman clearly loved him. Thatâs more than I can say for a majority of American men with functioning penises, who die alone (either unmarried or divorced).
He was masculine, handsome, charismatic, all while being effectively castrated. He was physically fit enough to fight in the Great War, and bravely won the iron cross â all while being biologically castrated. Doesnât that make him more impressive than he would otherwise be, if he was just a normal guy with normal balls? These all sound like superhuman feats. If my balls were missing, I think I would just kill myself, to be honest with you.
Anyway, there are many men with weird balls, and most of them do not start world wars. What I am concerned with is not whether Hitler had small balls or a micropenis, but what was the substance of his ideology, and where does it come from?
I reject Hananiaâs conclusion that Hitler being genetically unique is a point in favor of the Great Man Theory. Iâm decisively against the theory. My theory of history is minoritarian. I believe that small, dedicated minorities shape history. Individuals do not matter.
This fact is so obvious to me that I have difficulty making an argument. If Hitler had no friends, he would have never accomplished anything at all.
I am not interested in Hitler as an individual. I reject the theory that the Germans were essentially good people with one bad apple who brainwashed them into insanity. I believe that the German leadership was both intelligent and insane. We could speculate about why exactly that was,3 but today I wonât be covering that. I just want to present the evidence of exactly how they were crazy. What was the substance of their crazy beliefs? In what manner were they crazy?
What follows is not the original translation. I have made amendments. But that is the purpose of a translation: to make something comprehensible. If you want to read the original source, I have linked it. This isnât meant to be a word-for-word copy of the book; itâs meant to be a cliff-notes version with pretty pictures.
Brief Biographical Introduction
