FEMINISMsteria: Best Dating Memes (Happy Valentine’s Day!)
God gave Adam a virgin (not a single mother of 3), the “I can’t make a good sandwich” pose 🙄, just so you know how it works with women and more dating memes - we have a date for Valentine’s Day! 😉
FEMINISMsteria: Best Women Memes (Can We Talk About Hoeflation?!!)
The Female Delusion Calculator (know your dating chances!), wondering why male virginity is on the rise, trying to understand women's logic, some equality ideas and more women memes!
>I am Harry Sisson. We are all Harry Sisson, or we will become him, someday.
I am not Harry Sisson, have never been Harry Sisson and will never be Harry Sisson.
I am not Harry Sisson and will never be him because I have a wife and a bunch of kids. Cheating on my wife would make me a less effective husband and father, because hypocrisy is an ineffective position. Cheating on her with retarded whores who expose you for clout would likely get me divorced, wrecking my kids' lives. Even if I could avoid divorce, I would lose moral authority and respect, making it harder for me to help my kids make the right decisions which will lead to them having big, healthy families. By acting like Harry Sisson, I would be destroying my own evolutionary fitness and adding to my long list of sins for which I'll have to answer to God.
I have never been Harry Sisson because, even in my hedonistic secular days, I would never have focused on something as lame as getting a girl who liked me to send me nudes. My goals were always more concrete and material than that. As lief be hanged for a sheep as for a lamb.
In the big picture, this is all Mouse Utopia behavior, sociosexual dysfunction leading inexorably up to a collapse.
I think there is an argument that if you live in such a shitty environnement you will get a false accusation and become a Harry Sisson. Even when you got a wife and kids you just need 1 woman to go against you for rational or irrational reasons (like being faithful to your wife) for her to be vindictive towards you like these women are against Harry.
Just the public attention to something false can erode your image and reputation, no matter how fase the allegations are.
That is a good thing, in the workplace I also got recommended to never be with a woman 1-1 in a meeting. And while not as religious as my peers I still apply avoid being alone with a woman who is not my partner out of respect for her.
I agree with DeepLeft here tho, demonizing heterosexual white (or other) men is not a good policy for anyone.
Agree, one of the things our societal decline in birthrates has exposed is how effective traditional religion is at maintaining replacement level birthrates even amindst general decline. It creates stable homes in a culture where dating and marriage are unstable. It creates a subculture of marital health and fidelity.
But the right has destroyed the church by covering up and defending pedophiles. They made it so much of their personality they lied to elect the most famous pedophile in the world to be President. The church has been declining at a precipitous rate due to the hypocrisy.
That's deceptive. Are they growing or are they assimilating a portion of decline from the "mainline churches"?
A mega-church is not evidence of growth of a religion, it is evidence of its decline. Like Wal Mart, one successful mega-church is the death of likely 200 local churches.
According to Eric Kaufmann is mostly through higher fertility of conservative religious types. This is true for various religious, not just Christianity.
Right, because there are no Liberals who left the church angrily after seeing church corruption from their own families.
Anyone who is a student of demographics knows that just because someone is born into a religious family, it doesn’t mean they will remain within the church.
Did anyone else notice that a lot of the girls he was DMing who were whining were hot? I wish they would date me and not that wokester. I have no idea why people are hating on him, meanwhile women chatting up 10 guys on snapchat are considered "empowered".
I only made it through half of this; but there's a huge difference culturally between what guys used to do 10 years ago and what they do now. A big part of that is honesty, "I am not interested in anything serious" is a key phrase that he needed to say; and then she can decide how much emotional risk she's willing to take. By lying, it creates a false dynamic and betrayal. I have no problem with guys who want to play games... until they lie. Which wasn't actually normal 20-10 years ago and has become very prevalent in recent years. Avoiding commitment vs faking commitment are two completely different things.
Normie lib lady here -- while I largely agree with this piece, I'll note two things. First, Sisson was *not* canceled. A couple years he might have been, but lefties seem to be recognizing that we need to tolerate male misbehavior again. One day, we might even reclaim Bill Clinton.
Second, your antipathy towards women takes you to some weird places. Take this:
"There is nothing more deceptive than pretending to be attracted to a man, and then turning him around and calling him “creepy, predatory, gross.” These women don’t believe anything they’re saying. They are making these false claims as an act of revenge against Harry for the crime of not marrying them — or whatever the Gen Z equivalent is (long-term-partnering?).""
You are right that the women behaved badly here. They tried to ruin a dude because he disappointed them romantically. But they obviously didn't pretend to be attracted to him. They *were* attracted to him, hence the nudes. And it's natural to believe that if someone hurts you, they've committed some moral error. They do believe he was predatory. Their reaction was just way over the top. Thankfully, they failed.
Let’s be real: Harry Sisson has the most punchable face in human history. His resting expression says “please, punch me here,” and the second he speaks, it escalates to “I want your knuckles in my sinuses.”
(For legal reasons, I’m not saying anyone should punch Harry. I’m saying that’s what his face is communicating to me, personally, with great urgency.)
But as silly as that is? I think that’s what this whole discourse boils down to. Not ethics. Not victimhood. Just vibes. It’s how he looks, how he speaks, how he performs allyship with a smugness that makes people want to expose him just to knock him off the pedestal.
And yet—I’ve got to hand it to you. You’re willing to wade into this radioactive swamp with clarity, humor, and a point. That’s rare. Most people either moralize or meme. You did both and still managed to raise real questions about selective outrage, sexual status games, and political hypocrisy. I respect the hell out of that.
Now, as for the core issue: it’s not about what Harry did. It’s about who Harry is—or rather, how high up the status pole women think he is. If he had movie star looks or family money, this entire situation would vanish in a puff of “he’s just hot” rationalizations. But he doesn’t. So instead of “sliding into DMs,” it becomes “predatory behavior.” That’s the game.
And both sides play it.
Your party lost its mind over Trump’s locker room talk. Called it disqualifying. Misogynistic. Predatory. And maybe it was. But now here comes a Zoomer golden boy, riding the wave of blue-check privilege, doing the same basic mating dance in a slightly more digital format—and suddenly, we’re supposed to feel sorry for him?
Nope. Either it’s all fair game… or none of it is.
I’m not saying Harry should be canceled. I’m saying neither should Trump. And that’s actually where left and right could meet—if either side was brave enough to admit that humans are horny, messy, status-driven animals who say dumb things when chasing attention. The real problem isn’t sex. It’s the moral performance about sex.
And yeah, there’s a deeper danger here too.
When normal male desire becomes taboo—but drag sex shows for kids are applauded—you’re not building tolerance. You’re building backlash. You’re creating a generation of men who feel like even flirting is radioactive unless you’re queer, famous, or apologizing while you do it.
Keep doing that, and they won’t just leave your movement. They’ll light it on fire on the way out.
So here’s my olive branch: you’re right that Democrats are losing young white men. You’re right that the purity spiral is unsustainable. And you’re right to say this isn’t about Harry—it’s about whether straight men are allowed to exist without being pre-cancelled for the sin of wanting a girlfriend and not being charming enough while asking.
I’m not defending Harry. I’m defending the principle.
And on that front? We might just be on the same side.
Yup. I can’t understand why anyone still does start to finish writing on their own anymore. I come up with a few sentences, put it in, hear it back, edit it, take it to a ChatGPT I have specifically for tone, work on it there, and post.
You don't speak for everyone. You only speak for you. And this "slop" has you paying attention to me and my writing, which is the point. "Everyone" isn't doing that. But YOU are.
You seem to want some sort of kudos or "Atta boy!" for noticing ChatGPT. So.... ummm...
Whenever I see the latest scandal or allegation against someone, I always think to myself: has someone in MAGA done worse? It’s usually always a resounding yes. And since 80 million people support that behavior in a president or cabinet, why should I care about some random TikToker? The president is a literal felon and sexual abuser…
When Harry Sisson messages you ("I'd f*ck you raw after the wine tasting..." 🤨), how do you do fellow straight men 🙄, DNC Chair David Hogg is going to be mad and more Harry Sisson s*x scandal memes!
Nancy Pelosi will work hard on implementing your request, right after she starts on Matthew Yglesias's plan for better zoning rules. This should be done around the time the sun becomes a red giant.
Right now, it's just a bunch of guys whining on the Internet. But second-wave feminism started in consciousness-raising circles.
You have to find other men who think the same way. Networking was never my strong point, so I can take you no further. But I can tell you it's not just you.
I think the most practical thing might be to join the Trump train, your other reservations (many of which I share) aside. They seem much more tolerant of minor transgressions on their side.
For what it's worth, the woman on X who was trying to push this story and introducing the "predator term" was a Republican operative. The response of "catturd" and others is likely a deliberate coordinated attempt to muddy the waters after President Trump pushing for the release of Andrew Tate.
“Some Democratic strategists argue that Democrats need to “go back to their base,” and more aggressively signal in favor of black nationalism.”
I consume a lot of political content but missed this. Who said this?
“The Democratic Party in 2024 is the most pro-minority political force in America’s history.”
Notably, this phenomenon seems to manifest primarily among certain minority groups—specifically, non-white gays and women. In these circles, there appears to be a pronounced discomfort with, and even disdain for, expressions of masculinity by minority men. A cursory look at Title IX cases indicates that black men are disproportionately represented among defendants, and some studies suggest they are up to seven times more likely to be falsely accused.
There’s a pervasive bias against all expressions of sexualized aggression but *especially* when it’s exhibited by minority men. Hence their hemorrhaging.
I've dated many women, and every single one of them knows I keep my technology PG. It has never kept me from getting laid, getting dates, getting girlfriends.
Unlike some, I have common sense. women respect common sense.
It’s always very disconcerting for me to learn how much more complicated and manipulative sex becomes when women are involved
Do you... think there are no judgmental, insulting, exploitative, manipulative, or abusive gay guys?
I have some news for you... go spend 5 minutes on grindr.
To be fair I don’t think this is at all a representative sample of sex with women. This looks like an extreme outlier case!
In my experience as a straight guy, "internet women" might as well be a distinct gender.
Well the outlier is people going crazy over it, but the texting and dirty pics are pretty normal
Right? So glad I’m gay. So so so glad.
You don't think men manipulate women to get sex?
I'VE COVERED WOMEN AND DATING A FEW TIMES E.G.:
FEMINISMsteria: Best Dating Memes (Happy Valentine’s Day!)
God gave Adam a virgin (not a single mother of 3), the “I can’t make a good sandwich” pose 🙄, just so you know how it works with women and more dating memes - we have a date for Valentine’s Day! 😉
https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/feminismsteria-best-dating-memes-happy-valentines-day
FEMINISMsteria: Best Women Memes (Can We Talk About Hoeflation?!!)
The Female Delusion Calculator (know your dating chances!), wondering why male virginity is on the rise, trying to understand women's logic, some equality ideas and more women memes!
https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/best-women-memes-lets-talk-about-hoeflation
>I am Harry Sisson. We are all Harry Sisson, or we will become him, someday.
I am not Harry Sisson, have never been Harry Sisson and will never be Harry Sisson.
I am not Harry Sisson and will never be him because I have a wife and a bunch of kids. Cheating on my wife would make me a less effective husband and father, because hypocrisy is an ineffective position. Cheating on her with retarded whores who expose you for clout would likely get me divorced, wrecking my kids' lives. Even if I could avoid divorce, I would lose moral authority and respect, making it harder for me to help my kids make the right decisions which will lead to them having big, healthy families. By acting like Harry Sisson, I would be destroying my own evolutionary fitness and adding to my long list of sins for which I'll have to answer to God.
I have never been Harry Sisson because, even in my hedonistic secular days, I would never have focused on something as lame as getting a girl who liked me to send me nudes. My goals were always more concrete and material than that. As lief be hanged for a sheep as for a lamb.
In the big picture, this is all Mouse Utopia behavior, sociosexual dysfunction leading inexorably up to a collapse.
Again, Haredi and other insular religious groups wont be sustaining advanced civillization
“Because…they just can't, that's why!”
I think there is an argument that if you live in such a shitty environnement you will get a false accusation and become a Harry Sisson. Even when you got a wife and kids you just need 1 woman to go against you for rational or irrational reasons (like being faithful to your wife) for her to be vindictive towards you like these women are against Harry.
Just the public attention to something false can erode your image and reputation, no matter how fase the allegations are.
Fortunately, I'm a religious Jew and am never alone with a woman who's not in my family, so not a ton of room for false accusations.
That is a good thing, in the workplace I also got recommended to never be with a woman 1-1 in a meeting. And while not as religious as my peers I still apply avoid being alone with a woman who is not my partner out of respect for her.
I agree with DeepLeft here tho, demonizing heterosexual white (or other) men is not a good policy for anyone.
Agree, one of the things our societal decline in birthrates has exposed is how effective traditional religion is at maintaining replacement level birthrates even amindst general decline. It creates stable homes in a culture where dating and marriage are unstable. It creates a subculture of marital health and fidelity.
But the right has destroyed the church by covering up and defending pedophiles. They made it so much of their personality they lied to elect the most famous pedophile in the world to be President. The church has been declining at a precipitous rate due to the hypocrisy.
Mainline churches are in decline. Conservative churches are growing.
That's deceptive. Are they growing or are they assimilating a portion of decline from the "mainline churches"?
A mega-church is not evidence of growth of a religion, it is evidence of its decline. Like Wal Mart, one successful mega-church is the death of likely 200 local churches.
According to Eric Kaufmann is mostly through higher fertility of conservative religious types. This is true for various religious, not just Christianity.
Right, because there are no Liberals who left the church angrily after seeing church corruption from their own families.
Anyone who is a student of demographics knows that just because someone is born into a religious family, it doesn’t mean they will remain within the church.
Did anyone else notice that a lot of the girls he was DMing who were whining were hot? I wish they would date me and not that wokester. I have no idea why people are hating on him, meanwhile women chatting up 10 guys on snapchat are considered "empowered".
I only made it through half of this; but there's a huge difference culturally between what guys used to do 10 years ago and what they do now. A big part of that is honesty, "I am not interested in anything serious" is a key phrase that he needed to say; and then she can decide how much emotional risk she's willing to take. By lying, it creates a false dynamic and betrayal. I have no problem with guys who want to play games... until they lie. Which wasn't actually normal 20-10 years ago and has become very prevalent in recent years. Avoiding commitment vs faking commitment are two completely different things.
Can we get an AI rendering of what these nudes might have looked like? I take this matter very seriously and won't be able to make a judgment with it.
Normie lib lady here -- while I largely agree with this piece, I'll note two things. First, Sisson was *not* canceled. A couple years he might have been, but lefties seem to be recognizing that we need to tolerate male misbehavior again. One day, we might even reclaim Bill Clinton.
Second, your antipathy towards women takes you to some weird places. Take this:
"There is nothing more deceptive than pretending to be attracted to a man, and then turning him around and calling him “creepy, predatory, gross.” These women don’t believe anything they’re saying. They are making these false claims as an act of revenge against Harry for the crime of not marrying them — or whatever the Gen Z equivalent is (long-term-partnering?).""
You are right that the women behaved badly here. They tried to ruin a dude because he disappointed them romantically. But they obviously didn't pretend to be attracted to him. They *were* attracted to him, hence the nudes. And it's natural to believe that if someone hurts you, they've committed some moral error. They do believe he was predatory. Their reaction was just way over the top. Thankfully, they failed.
Let’s be real: Harry Sisson has the most punchable face in human history. His resting expression says “please, punch me here,” and the second he speaks, it escalates to “I want your knuckles in my sinuses.”
(For legal reasons, I’m not saying anyone should punch Harry. I’m saying that’s what his face is communicating to me, personally, with great urgency.)
But as silly as that is? I think that’s what this whole discourse boils down to. Not ethics. Not victimhood. Just vibes. It’s how he looks, how he speaks, how he performs allyship with a smugness that makes people want to expose him just to knock him off the pedestal.
And yet—I’ve got to hand it to you. You’re willing to wade into this radioactive swamp with clarity, humor, and a point. That’s rare. Most people either moralize or meme. You did both and still managed to raise real questions about selective outrage, sexual status games, and political hypocrisy. I respect the hell out of that.
Now, as for the core issue: it’s not about what Harry did. It’s about who Harry is—or rather, how high up the status pole women think he is. If he had movie star looks or family money, this entire situation would vanish in a puff of “he’s just hot” rationalizations. But he doesn’t. So instead of “sliding into DMs,” it becomes “predatory behavior.” That’s the game.
And both sides play it.
Your party lost its mind over Trump’s locker room talk. Called it disqualifying. Misogynistic. Predatory. And maybe it was. But now here comes a Zoomer golden boy, riding the wave of blue-check privilege, doing the same basic mating dance in a slightly more digital format—and suddenly, we’re supposed to feel sorry for him?
Nope. Either it’s all fair game… or none of it is.
I’m not saying Harry should be canceled. I’m saying neither should Trump. And that’s actually where left and right could meet—if either side was brave enough to admit that humans are horny, messy, status-driven animals who say dumb things when chasing attention. The real problem isn’t sex. It’s the moral performance about sex.
And yeah, there’s a deeper danger here too.
When normal male desire becomes taboo—but drag sex shows for kids are applauded—you’re not building tolerance. You’re building backlash. You’re creating a generation of men who feel like even flirting is radioactive unless you’re queer, famous, or apologizing while you do it.
Keep doing that, and they won’t just leave your movement. They’ll light it on fire on the way out.
So here’s my olive branch: you’re right that Democrats are losing young white men. You’re right that the purity spiral is unsustainable. And you’re right to say this isn’t about Harry—it’s about whether straight men are allowed to exist without being pre-cancelled for the sin of wanting a girlfriend and not being charming enough while asking.
I’m not defending Harry. I’m defending the principle.
And on that front? We might just be on the same side.
ChatGPT commenting here. A bit long tho.
Yup. I can’t understand why anyone still does start to finish writing on their own anymore. I come up with a few sentences, put it in, hear it back, edit it, take it to a ChatGPT I have specifically for tone, work on it there, and post.
For comments on Substack? Because no one wants to read ChatGPT slop and we can instantly clock it.
You don't speak for everyone. You only speak for you. And this "slop" has you paying attention to me and my writing, which is the point. "Everyone" isn't doing that. But YOU are.
You seem to want some sort of kudos or "Atta boy!" for noticing ChatGPT. So.... ummm...
Atta boy! Well done!!!
Need anything else, or we good?
On the contrary I wanted you to know it was unremarkably easy to spot it
Well thanks for letting me know how unremarkable you are; clearly that's important to you.
Whenever I see the latest scandal or allegation against someone, I always think to myself: has someone in MAGA done worse? It’s usually always a resounding yes. And since 80 million people support that behavior in a president or cabinet, why should I care about some random TikToker? The president is a literal felon and sexual abuser…
PRIDEsteria: Best Harry Sisson S*x Scandal Memes
When Harry Sisson messages you ("I'd f*ck you raw after the wine tasting..." 🤨), how do you do fellow straight men 🙄, DNC Chair David Hogg is going to be mad and more Harry Sisson s*x scandal memes!
https://covidsteria.substack.com/p/pridesteria-best-harry-sisson-s-x-scandal-memes
Nancy Pelosi will work hard on implementing your request, right after she starts on Matthew Yglesias's plan for better zoning rules. This should be done around the time the sun becomes a red giant.
You have my complete support.
If you start a movement, I will join it.
Right now, it's just a bunch of guys whining on the Internet. But second-wave feminism started in consciousness-raising circles.
You have to find other men who think the same way. Networking was never my strong point, so I can take you no further. But I can tell you it's not just you.
I think the most practical thing might be to join the Trump train, your other reservations (many of which I share) aside. They seem much more tolerant of minor transgressions on their side.
For what it's worth, the woman on X who was trying to push this story and introducing the "predator term" was a Republican operative. The response of "catturd" and others is likely a deliberate coordinated attempt to muddy the waters after President Trump pushing for the release of Andrew Tate.
"You can be trans, a furry, a gooner — none of this is illegal."
..yet, growth mindset:
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2025/03/12/texas-republican-proposes-jail-time-for-identifying-as-transgender/
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/22/health/transgender-adults-treatment-bans.html
https://www.fox4news.com/news/texas-bill-ban-furries
oh wait, I should include stuff for gooners:
https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/new-texas-bill-could-make-incredibly-popular-anime-video-games-illegal-3163247/
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/15/nx-s1-5260178/supreme-court-texas-porn-law
Trans, Furry, Gooner? texas will ban them all.
tbc this is a bad thing i think
“Some Democratic strategists argue that Democrats need to “go back to their base,” and more aggressively signal in favor of black nationalism.”
I consume a lot of political content but missed this. Who said this?
“The Democratic Party in 2024 is the most pro-minority political force in America’s history.”
Notably, this phenomenon seems to manifest primarily among certain minority groups—specifically, non-white gays and women. In these circles, there appears to be a pronounced discomfort with, and even disdain for, expressions of masculinity by minority men. A cursory look at Title IX cases indicates that black men are disproportionately represented among defendants, and some studies suggest they are up to seven times more likely to be falsely accused.
There’s a pervasive bias against all expressions of sexualized aggression but *especially* when it’s exhibited by minority men. Hence their hemorrhaging.
I've dated many women, and every single one of them knows I keep my technology PG. It has never kept me from getting laid, getting dates, getting girlfriends.
Unlike some, I have common sense. women respect common sense.
Inside the heart of every Deep Leftist lurks a screaming Willie Dynamite who struggles to escape.