This is close but ultimately wrong analysis. Socio-Economic status is probably the most important, but most men are going to be the same status once you leave high school. You can only ascend by status by:
1. being a public figure - actor, comedian, rockstar etc
2. Being at the very top if not a public figure, CEOs, famous professors, novelists etc. This also assumes the girl knows that field and knows you’re at the top or it’s not gonna matter.
Being an L4 vs L5 in Google does not matter, or even being in OpenAI vs Salesforce unless it’s a super status conscious Asian. The most band for buck for a guy, with just 10,000$ is his face. Assume he’s lean maxed, he should do high ROI surgeries to looksmax, if he can ascend it will completely change his life that way. Now if he had 10M, he could maybe do something for his status, which would involve buying a nightclub or a bar, though it’s more likely to work with 100M. No one’s making that much money, looks are easier, cheaper and much higher ROI once you’ve softmaxxed to your potential.
Wouldn’t it be better to just swap out upper body strength with overall athleticism. Running fast and jumping high is very attractive. Probably more attractive than bench pressing a lot of weight.
A discussion on male attractiveness that doesn’t mention height.
Wondering whether it was a deliberate omission or you missed it?
I did realize this afterwards but I said it's a draft.
Overrated as a tall guy, along with looks
??? not the first part being blatantly racist?
Someone once predicted this mans sewerslide by 2029 and i believe it still rings true
Don't read
I need to let you know that you don’t know the female gaze
Bill (who I know from Hemlock Grove) is extremely hot and I was fiending at him a bit while watching Hemlock Grove.
You do not know the female gaze.
You are not representative
Bill had a massive slobbering fanbase for his role in Hemlock Grove.
https://www.pinterest.com/happynorelle/dark-sexy-bill-skarsg%C3%A5rd/
This is close but ultimately wrong analysis. Socio-Economic status is probably the most important, but most men are going to be the same status once you leave high school. You can only ascend by status by:
1. being a public figure - actor, comedian, rockstar etc
2. Being at the very top if not a public figure, CEOs, famous professors, novelists etc. This also assumes the girl knows that field and knows you’re at the top or it’s not gonna matter.
Being an L4 vs L5 in Google does not matter, or even being in OpenAI vs Salesforce unless it’s a super status conscious Asian. The most band for buck for a guy, with just 10,000$ is his face. Assume he’s lean maxed, he should do high ROI surgeries to looksmax, if he can ascend it will completely change his life that way. Now if he had 10M, he could maybe do something for his status, which would involve buying a nightclub or a bar, though it’s more likely to work with 100M. No one’s making that much money, looks are easier, cheaper and much higher ROI once you’ve softmaxxed to your potential.
This isn't true, that's not how women calculate status.
Very creative way of telling the world you're gay x
Ok
Bill Skarsgård is a nordic chad and the picture u used is a lie!
Women vastly underestimate how much men value a good personality when it comes to attraction
Wouldn’t it be better to just swap out upper body strength with overall athleticism. Running fast and jumping high is very attractive. Probably more attractive than bench pressing a lot of weight.
No, upper body strength is born out by empirical studies of attractiveness.