The whole "I'm a liberal but I still have my BALLS" thing on this site is getting really old. You all think you just discovered fire but it's just manufactured edginess and bombastic, half-sincere and poorly explored ideas designed to hide a kernel of empty malice at basically everything. Faux-deconstruction. The natural endpoint of post-irony for neurotic zoomers and millennials. Manic, terror-fueled, terminally online drivel.
You're clearly intelligent and capable of insight, just chill the fuck out and learn some emotional regulation skills. Center yourself.
And what is your rage post but aesthetic disgust from human life? How much better is what you actually want to sell then stylistic critique? Assuming you are actually not joking. Obviously btw, it's not classical liberal and not what stupid leftists mean by neoliberal.
The argument here which I did was basically that human life are not aesthetical to you and morally pointless, so you don't fell guilty about only caring about nature and about the types of people you categorize as brilliant and less ugly. Am I getting this wrong? Maybe I'm not one of the brilliant people, but you could explain it better.
I've noticed many of your kind also don't have a very strong grasp of the English language despite your verbosity, so I can't tell if you realize that that statement implies that you did or do actually think otherwise. Also why is "think otherwise" in quotes?
Yes people physically and mentally sub par reproducing too much can have a negative impact. Yes, most peoples lives are boring. No, people are not destroying the world. Waste heaps are ugly but cover a tiny percentage of the planets surface. No humans are not a cancer. Humanity and associated civilisation are by far the most interesting force in the universe we know of.
The whole "I'm a liberal but I still have my BALLS" thing on this site is getting really old. You all think you just discovered fire but it's just manufactured edginess and bombastic, half-sincere and poorly explored ideas designed to hide a kernel of empty malice at basically everything. Faux-deconstruction. The natural endpoint of post-irony for neurotic zoomers and millennials. Manic, terror-fueled, terminally online drivel.
You're clearly intelligent and capable of insight, just chill the fuck out and learn some emotional regulation skills. Center yourself.
You did not make an argument though, you're just issuing a stylistic critique
And what is your rage post but aesthetic disgust from human life? How much better is what you actually want to sell then stylistic critique? Assuming you are actually not joking. Obviously btw, it's not classical liberal and not what stupid leftists mean by neoliberal.
I make substantive arguments, you do not read
The argument here which I did was basically that human life are not aesthetical to you and morally pointless, so you don't fell guilty about only caring about nature and about the types of people you categorize as brilliant and less ugly. Am I getting this wrong? Maybe I'm not one of the brilliant people, but you could explain it better.
Correct, I'm not sure why you thought otherwise. Me agreeing or disagreeing with the ideas presented here is irrelevant.
I didn't "think otherwise"
>You did not make an argument -though-
I've noticed many of your kind also don't have a very strong grasp of the English language despite your verbosity, so I can't tell if you realize that that statement implies that you did or do actually think otherwise. Also why is "think otherwise" in quotes?
Yes people physically and mentally sub par reproducing too much can have a negative impact. Yes, most peoples lives are boring. No, people are not destroying the world. Waste heaps are ugly but cover a tiny percentage of the planets surface. No humans are not a cancer. Humanity and associated civilisation are by far the most interesting force in the universe we know of.
Based and Ehrlich pilled.